ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2020
Destruction of the stem cell Niche, Pathogenesis and Promising Treatment Targets for Primary Scarring Alopecias.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hair follicle regeneration technology: from microenvironment regulation to functional reconstruction.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Hair follicle immune privilege in autoimmune and immune-mediated alopecias: paths toward reestablishing immune tolerance.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Single-cell sequencing combined with spatial transcriptomics reveals the characteristics of follicle-targeted inflammation patterns in primary cicatricial alopecia.Cell & bioscience · 2025Article
- Review
- Cellular Heterogeneity Facilitates the Functional Differences Between Hair Follicle Dermal Sheath Cells and Dermal Papilla Cells: A New Classification System for Mesenchymal Cells within the Hair Follicle Niche.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2022Review
- Expression and localization of Sox10 during hair follicle morphogenesis and induced hair cycle.International journal of medical sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Primary Scarring Alopecias are characterised by the irreversible destruction and fibrosis of hair follicles, leading to permanent and often disfiguring loss of hair. The pathophysiology of these diseases is not well understood. However, follicular-fibrosis and loss of the stem-cell niche appears to be a common theme. This review explores the pathogenesis of primary scarring alopecias, asking what happens to the stem cells of the hair follicle and how they may contribute to the progression of these diseases. Bulge-resident cells are lost (leading to loss of capacity for hair growth) from the follicle either by inflammatory-mediate apoptosis or through epigenetic reprogramming to assume a mesenchymal-like identity. What proportion of bulge cells is lost to which process is unknown and probably differs depending on the individual PCA and its specific inflammatory cell infiltrate. The formation of fibroblast-like cells from follicular stem cells may also mean that the cells of the bulge have a direct role in the pathogenesis. The identification of specific cells involved in the pathogenesis of these diseases could provide unique diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities to prevent disease progression by preventing EMT and specific pro-fibrotic signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.