ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2020
Robotic resection for benign primary retroperitoneal tumors via the transperitoneal approach.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic retroperitoneal tumor resection: a video vignette.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSurgical resection is the primary treatment for benign primary retroperitoneal tumors. However, only a few studies have reported robotic resection for retroperitoneal tumors due to the low morbidity rate, and only a small fraction of retroperitoneal tumors are eligible for minimally invasive operations.
methodsA retrospective study enrolling 16 patients with benign primary retroperitoneal tumors between November 2016 and April 2020 was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of robotic resection for benign primary retroperitoneal tumors via the transperitoneal approach. Surgical skills were described in detail and operative experiences were summarized.
resultsThe operations were uneventfully performed without conversion in all the patients. The median operation time was 135 (120-180) min, and the median estimated blood loss was 25 (20-60) mL. The median duration of diet restoration was 2 (1-2) days and the median length of postoperative hospital stay was 6 (4-7) days. No serious intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred during the perioperative period.
conclusionsRobotic resection via the transperitoneal approach is a feasible and safe procedure for highly selected patients with benign primary retroperitoneal tumors, with few postoperative complications and a rapid recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.