Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32789517›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outcomes in French Nursing Homes That Implemented Staff Confinement With Residents.

Joël Belmin, Nathavy Um-Din, Cristiano Donadio, Maurizio Magri, Quoc Duy Nghiem, Bruno Oquendo, Sylvie Pariel, Carmelo Lafuente-Lafuente

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Facility- and ward-level factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks among residents in long-term care facilities: A retrospective cohort study.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Covid-19 and Aging: Challenges and Opportunities.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joël BelminService Universitaire de Gériatrie, Hôpital Charles Foix, Groupe Hospitalier APHP Sorbonne Université, Ivry-sur-Seine, France.
Nathavy Um-DinService Universitaire de Gériatrie, Hôpital Charles Foix, Groupe Hospitalier APHP Sorbonne Université, Ivry-sur-Seine, France.
Cristiano DonadioService Universitaire de Gériatrie, Hôpital Charles Foix, Groupe Hospitalier APHP Sorbonne Université, Ivry-sur-Seine, France.
Maurizio MagriService Universitaire de Gériatrie, Hôpital Charles Foix, Groupe Hospitalier APHP Sorbonne Université, Ivry-sur-Seine, France.
Quoc Duy NghiemService Universitaire de Gériatrie, Hôpital Charles Foix, Groupe Hospitalier APHP Sorbonne Université, Ivry-sur-Seine, France.
Bruno OquendoService Universitaire de Gériatrie, Hôpital Charles Foix, Groupe Hospitalier APHP Sorbonne Université, Ivry-sur-Seine, France.
Sylvie ParielService Universitaire de Gériatrie, Hôpital Charles Foix, Groupe Hospitalier APHP Sorbonne Université, Ivry-sur-Seine, France.
Carmelo Lafuente-LafuenteService Universitaire de Gériatrie, Hôpital Charles Foix, Groupe Hospitalier APHP Sorbonne Université, Ivry-sur-Seine, France.
Hôpital Charles-Foix · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a major threat to nursing homes. During the COVID-19 pandemic wave that hit France in March and April 2020, staff members of some French nursing homes decided to confine themselves with their residents on a voluntary basis to reduce the risk of entry of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 into the facility.

objectiveTo investigate COVID-19-related outcomes in French nursing homes that implemented voluntary staff confinement with residents. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted in French nursing homes from March 1 to May 11, 2020. Participants included residents and staff members of the nursing homes where staff participated in voluntary self-confinement as well as those of the facilities for elderly people where staff did not practice self-confinement. Rates of COVID-19 cases and mortality in the cohort of nursing homes with self confinement were compared with those derived from a population-based survey of nursing homes conducted by French health authorities. EXPOSURES: Nursing homes with staff who self-confined were identified from the media and included if the confinement period of staff with residents was longer than 7 days. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Mortality related to COVID-19 among residents and COVID-19 cases among residents and staff members. COVID-19 was diagnosed by primary care or hospital physicians on the basis of fever and respiratory signs (eg, cough, dyspnea) or a clinical illness compatible with COVID-19; COVID-19 diagnoses were considered confirmed if real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 on nasopharyngeal swab was positive and considered possible if the test had not been performed or results were negative. Cases of COVID-19 were recorded by a telephone interview with the directors of nursing homes with staff who self-confined and by a nationwide declaration survey to health authorities for all facilities.

resultsThis study included 17 nursing homes in which 794 staff members confined themselves to the facility with their 1250 residents. The national survey included 9513 facilities with 385 290 staff members and 695 060 residents. Only 1 nursing home with staff who self-confined (5.8%) had cases of COVID-19 among residents, compared with 4599 facilities in the national survey (48.3%) (P < .001). Five residents (0.4%) in the nursing homes with staff who self-confined had confirmed COVID-19, compared with 30 569 residents (4.4%) with confirmed COVID-19 in the national survey (P < .001); no residents of facilities with self-confinement had possible COVID-19, compared with 31 799 residents (4.6%) with possible COVID-19 in the national survey (P < .001). Five residents (0.4%) in the nursing homes with staff who self-confined died of COVID-19, compared with 12 516 (1.8%) in the national survey (odds ratio, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.09-0.53; P < .001). Twelve staff members (1.6%) from the facilties with self-confinement had confirmed or possible COVID-19, compared with 29 463 staff members (7.6%) in the national survey (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study of French nursing homes during the COVID-19 pandemic, mortality rates related to COVID-19 were lower among nursing homes that implemented staff confinement with residents compared with those in a national survey. These findings suggest that self-confinement of staff members with residents may help protect nursing home residents from mortality related to COVID-19 and residents and staff from COVID-19 infection.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusHomes for the AgedNursing HomesNursing StaffSocial IsolationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FranceHumansPandemicsPneumonia, ViralRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32789517
PMCPMC7426749
OpenAlexW3048708816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.