Trial reportJAMA network open2020
Effect of D-Cycloserine on the Effect of Concentrated Exposure and Response Prevention in Difficult-to-Treat Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02656342 (Translational Approach to the Understanding and Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Translational Approach to the Understanding and Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Can D-Cycloserine Enhance and Stabilize the Treatment-response in Relapsed and Non-responding OCD-patients? A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled National Study
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rational and Translational Implications of D-Amino Acids for Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: From Neurobiology to the Clinics.Biomolecules · 2022Pooled it
- The effectiveness of exposure and response prevention combined with pharmacotherapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Pooled it
- Concentrated Exposure Therapy vs Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Motivation in the Bergen 4-day treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder.BMC psychiatry · 2025Trial
- Treatment expectancy and credibility as predictors of concentrated exposure treatment outcomes in patients with difficult-to-treat obsessive-compulsive disorder.BMC psychiatry · 2025Trial
- Concentrated ERP for Patients With Difficult-to-Treat OCD: Insight as a Predictor of Acute and Long-Term Outcomes.Depression and anxiety · 2025Trial
- The Bergen 4-day treatment for social anxiety disorder: a pilot study.BMC psychiatry · 2024Trial
- The Bergen 4-day treatment for panic disorder: replication and implementation in a new clinic.BMC psychiatry · 2022Trial
- Efficacy of D-cycloserine augmented brief intensive cognitive-behavioural therapy for paediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: A randomised clinical trial.Depression and anxiety · 2022Trial
- The Bergen 4-Day OCD Treatment: A Comprehensive Scoping Review of Evidence and Implementation.Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Making Sense of Non-Response: What Patients Teach Us About Concentrated Exposure Therapy for Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Brief treatments for panic disorder: a pilot study of the bergen repeated one-session treatment format.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Nutraceuticals and obsessive-compulsive disorder therapy.Advances in neurotoxicology · 2026Article
- The bergen 4-day treatment for panic disorder: a longer-term follow-up.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- The Bergen 4-Day Treatment for panic disorder patients in a rural clinical setting: a long-term follow-up study.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Patient adherence as a predictor of acute and long-term outcomes in concentrated exposure treatment for difficult-to-treat obsessive-compulsive disorder.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- The Bergen 4-day treatment for panic disorder: adapting to COVID-19 restrictions with a hybrid approach of face-to-face and videoconference modalities.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Using pre-treatment de novo threat conditioning outcomes to predict treatment response to DCS augmentation of exposure-based CBT.Journal of psychiatric research · 2023Article
- Psychotherapies and digital interventions for OCD in adults: What do we know, what do we need still to explore?Comprehensive psychiatry · 2023Review
- Mechanisms of exposure and response prevention in obsessive-compulsive disorder: effects of habituation and expectancy violation on short-term outcome in cognitive behavioral therapy.BMC psychiatry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Evidence is lacking for viable treatment options for patients with difficult-to-treat obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). It has been suggested that D-cycloserine (DCS) could potentiate the effect of exposure and response prevention (ERP) treatment, but the hypothesis has not been tested among patients with difficult-to-treat OCD. Objective: To evaluate whether DCS potentiates the effect of concentrated ERP among patients with difficult-to-treat OCD. Design, Setting, and Participants: The study was a randomized placebo-controlled triple-masked study with a 12-month follow-up. Participants were adult outpatients with difficult-to-treat OCD. A total of 220 potential participants were referred, of whom 36 did not meet inclusion criteria and 21 declined to participate. Patients had either relapsed after (n = 100) or not responded to (n = 63) previous ERP treatment. A total of 9 specialized OCD teams within the public health care system in Norway participated, giving national coverage. An expert team of therapists from the coordinating site delivered treatment. Inclusion of patients started in January 2016 and ended in August 2017. Data analysis was conducted February to September 2019. Interventions: All patients received individual, concentrated ERP treatment delivered during 4 consecutive days in a group setting (the Bergen 4-day treatment format) combined with 100 mg DCS, 250 mg DCS, or placebo. Main outcomes and Measures: Change in symptoms of OCD and change in diagnostic status. Secondary outcomes measures included self-reported symptoms of OCD, anxiety, depression, and quality of life. Results: The total sample of 163 patients had a mean (SD) age of 34.5 (10.9) years, and most were women (117 [71.8%]). They had experienced OCD for a mean (SD) of 16.2 (10.2) years. A total of 65 patients (39.9%) were randomized to receive 100 mg DCS, 67 (41.1%) to 250 mg of DCS, and 31 (19.0%) to placebo. Overall, 91 (56.5%) achieved remission at posttreatment, while 70 (47.9%) did so at the 12-month follow-up. There was no significant difference in remission rates among groups. There was a significant reduction in symptoms at 12 months, and within-group effect sizes ranged from 3.01 (95% CI, 2.38-3.63) for the group receiving 250 mg DCS to 3.49 (95% CI, 2.78-4.18) for the group receiving 100 mg DCS (all P < .001). However, there was no significant effect of treatment group compared with placebo in obsessive-compulsive symptoms (250 mg group at posttreatment: d = 0.33; 95% CI, -0.10 to 0.76; 100 mg group at posttreatment: d = 0.36; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.79), symptoms of depression and anxiety (eg, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score among 250 mg group at 12-month follow-up: d = 0.30; 95% CI, -0.17 to 0.76; Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 score among 100 mg group at 12-month follow-up: d = 0.27; 95% CI, -0.19 to 0.73), and well-being (250 mg group: d = 0.10; 95% CI, -0.42 to 0.63; 100 mg group: d = 0.34; 95% CI, -0.19 to 0.86). No serious adverse effects were reported. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, DCS did not potentiate ERP treatment effect, but concentrated ERP treatment was associated with improvement. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02656342.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.