Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32789480›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2020

Effect of Adjuvant Paclitaxel and Carboplatin on Survival in Women With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Ke-Da Yu, Fu-Gui Ye, Min He, Lei Fan, Ding Ma, Miao Mo, Jiong Wu, Guang-Yu Liu, Gen-Hong Di, Xiao-Hua Zeng and 12 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 125 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01216111 phase3completednot on this map

A Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Multicentric,phaseIII Clinical Trial Compared With PC and CEF100 Followed by Docetaxel as Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimen for Chinese Primary Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorFudan UniversityRan2011 to 2016Enrolled647ConditionsTriple Negative Breast CancerArmsPaclitaxel Cisplatin, fluorouracil epirubicin cyclophosphamide and docetaxel (FEC-T)
NCT05901025 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Homologous Recombination Repair Pathway Gene Mutation Spectrum in Chinese Breast Cancer Patients: A Multi-center, Prospective, Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorShanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineRan2023 to 2033Enrolled5,000ConditionsBreast Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 203 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. SEOM-GEICAM-SOLTI clinical guidelines for early-stage breast cancer (UPDATE 2025).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Guideline
  3. Efficacy and safety of a combination treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Platinum-based chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

Ke-Da YuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Fu-Gui YeDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Min HeDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Lei FanDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Ding MaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Miao MoDepartment of Cancer Prevention & Clinical Statistics Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Jiong WuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Guang-Yu LiuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Gen-Hong DiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Xiao-Hua ZengBreast Center, Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Ping-Qing HeDepartment of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Ke-Jin WuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yi-Feng HouDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Jie WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, The International Peace Maternity & Child Health Hospital of China Welfare Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Cheng WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Huangpu Branch, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Zhi-Gang ZhuangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Shanghai Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Chuan-Gui SongDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Xiao-Yan LinDepartment of Breast Surgery, Tongji University School of Medicine Yangpu Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Angela TossDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Francesco RicciDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation, Institute Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France.
Zhen-Zhou ShenDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Zhi-Ming ShaoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNChongqing University · CNFujian Medical University · CNInstitut Curie · FRObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University · CNShanghai Cancer Institute · CNShanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNShanghai Sixth People's Hospital · CNUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITYangpu Hospital of Tongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The value of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains controversial, as does whether BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) germline variants are associated with platinum treatment sensitivity. Objective: To compare 6 cycles of paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PCb) with a standard-dose regimen of 3 cycles of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil followed by 3 cycles of docetaxel (CEF-T). Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted at 9 cancer centers and hospitals in China. Between July 1, 2011, and April 30, 2016, women aged 18 to 70 years with operable TNBC after definitive surgery (having pathologically confirmed regional node-positive disease or node-negative disease with tumor diameter >10 mm) were screened and enrolled. Exclusion criteria included having metastatic or locally advanced disease, having non-TNBC, or receiving preoperative anticancer therapy. Data were analyzed from December 1, 2019, to January 31, 2020, from the intent-to-treat population as prespecified in the protocol. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive PCb (paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 and carboplatin [area under the curve = 2] on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days for 6 cycles) or CEF-T (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 100 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for 3 cycles followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for 3 cycles). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary end points included overall survival, distant DFS, relapse-free survival, DFS in patients with germline variants in BRCA1/2 or homologous recombination repair (HRR)-related genes, and toxicity. Results: A total of 647 patients (mean [SD] age, 51 [44-57] years) with operable TNBC were randomized to receive CEF-T (n = 322) or PCb (n = 325). At a median follow-up of 62 months, DFS time was longer in those assigned to PCb compared with CEF-T (5-year DFS, 86.5% vs 80.3%, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44-0.96; P = .03). Similar outcomes were observed for distant DFS and relapse-free survival. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between the groups (HR = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.42-1.22, P = .22). In the exploratory and hypothesis-generating subgroup analyses of PCb vs CEF-T, the HR for DFS was 0.44 (95% CI, 0.15-1.31; P = .14) in patients with the BRCA1/2 variant and 0.39 (95% CI, 0.15-0.99; P = .04) in those with the HRR variant. Safety data were consistent with the known safety profiles of relevant drugs. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that a paclitaxel-plus-carboplatin regimen is an effective alternative adjuvant chemotherapy choice for patients with operable TNBC. In the era of molecular classification, subsets of TNBC sensitive to PCb should be further investigated. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01216111.

Indexed as

AdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinCarboplatinChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGerm-Line MutationHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPaclitaxelTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanCarboplatinPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID32789480
PMCPMC7426881
OpenAlexW3048815387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.