Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32789463›Full record

ArticleMilitary medicine2020

Rheumatology Clinicians' Perceptions of Telerheumatology Within the Veterans Health Administration: A National Survey Study.

Rachel A Matsumoto, Bryant R England, Ginnifer Mastarone, J Steuart Richards, Elizabeth Chang, Patrick R Wood, Jennifer L Barton

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Military medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Opportunities and Barriers of Telemedicine in Rheumatology: A Participatory, Mixed-Methods Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Telerheumatology: A Narrative Review.Rheumatology and immunology research · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Managing patients using telerheumatology: Lessons from a pandemic.Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel A MatsumotoCenter to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Rd., Portland, OR 97239.
Bryant R EnglandVA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System & University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE.
Ginnifer MastaroneCenter to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Rd., Portland, OR 97239.
J Steuart RichardsPittsburgh VA Medical Center & University of Pittsburgh, University Drive C, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Elizabeth ChangPhoenix VA Health Care System, 650 E Indian School Rd., Phoenix, AZ 85012.
Patrick R WoodRocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center & University of Colorado School of Medicine, 1700 N Wheeling St., Aurora, CO 80045.
Jennifer L BartonCenter to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Rd., Portland, OR 97239.
VA Portland Health Care System · USOregon Health & Science University · USPhoenix VA Health Care System · USRocky Mountain MS Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USVA Nebraska Western Iowa Health Care System · US

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115458 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI RIZZO, MATTHEW · 2016 to 2025
$42.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115458
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration (VA) Strategic Plan (Fiscal Year 2018-2024) identified four priorities for care including easy access, timely and integrated care, accountability, and modernization, all of which can be directly or indirectly impacted by telemedicine technologies. These strategic goals, coupled with an anticipated rheumatology workforce shortage, has created a need for additional care delivery methods such as clinical video telehealth application to rheumatology (ie, telerheumatology). Rheumatology clinician perceptions of clinical usefulness telerheumatology have received limited attention in the past. The present study aimed to evaluate rheumatologists' perceptions of and experiences with telemedicine, generally, and telerheumatology, specifically, within the VA. MATERIALS AND

methodsA 38-item survey based on an existing telehealth providers' satisfaction survey was developed by two VA rheumatologists with experience in telemedicine as well as a social scientist experienced in survey development and user experience through an iterative process. Questions probed VA rheumatology clinician satisfaction with training and information technology (IT) supports, as well as barriers to using telemedicine. Additionally, clinician perceptions of the impact and usefulness of and appropriate clinical contexts for telerheumatology were evaluated. The survey was disseminated online via VA REDCap to members of the VA Rheumatology Consortium (VARC) through a LISTSERV. The study protocol was approved by the host institution IRB through expedited review. Survey responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

resultsForty-five anonymous responses (20% response rate) were collected. Of those who responded, 47% were female, 98% were between 35 and 64 years old, 71% reported working at an academic center, and the majority was physician-level practitioners (98%). Respondents generally considered themselves to be tech savvy (58%). Thirty-six percent of the sample reported past experience with telemedicine, and, of those, 29% reported experience with telerheumatology specifically. Clinicians identified the greatest barrier to effective telerheumatology as the inability to perform a physical exam (71%) but agreed that telerheumatology is vital to increasing access to care (59%) and quality of care (40%) in the VA. Overall, regardless of experience with telemedicine, respondents reported that telerheumatology was more helpful for management of rheumatologic conditions rather than initial diagnosis.

conclusionsWhile the majority of rheumatology clinicians did not report past experience with telerheumatology, they agreed that it has potential to further the VA mission of improved access and quality of care. Rheumatology clinicians felt the suitability of telerheumatology is dependent on the phase of care. As remote care technologies continue to be rapidly adopted into clinic, clinician perceptions of and experiences with telemedicine will need to be addressed in order to maintain high-quality and clinician- and patient-centric care within VA rheumatology.

Indexed as

RheumatologyTelemedicineVeterans HealthAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID32789463
PMCPMC7772518
OpenAlexW3049455633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.