Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32788979›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

Latitudinal trend in the reproductive mode of the pea aphid

Sebastián I Martel, Carmen G Ossa, Jean-Christophe Simon, Christian C Figueroa, Francisco Bozinovic

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sebastián I MartelDepartamento de Ecología Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas Center of Applied Ecology and Sustainability (CAPES) Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago de Chile Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7469-6878
Carmen G OssaInstituto de Biología Facultad de Ciencias Universidad de Valparaíso Valparaíso Chile.
Jean-Christophe SimonUMR IGEPP INRAE Agrocampus Ouest Université de Rennes 1 Le Rheu France.
Christian C FigueroaInstituto de Ciencias Biológicas Center for Molecular and Functional Ecology in Agroecosystems (CEMF) Universidad de Talca Talca Chile.
Francisco BozinovicDepartamento de Ecología Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas Center of Applied Ecology and Sustainability (CAPES) Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago de Chile Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3870-9624
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLInstitut Agro Rennes-Angers · FRUniversity of Talca · CLUniversity of Valparaíso · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The maintenance of sexuality is a puzzling phenomenon in evolutionary biology. Many universal hypotheses have been proposed to explain the prevalence of sex despite its costs, but it has been hypothesized that sex could be also retained by lineage-specific mechanisms that would confer some short-term advantage. Aphids are good models to study the maintenance of sex because they exhibit coexistence of both sexual and asexual populations within the same species and because they invade a large variety of ecosystems. Sex in aphids is thought to be maintained because only sexually produced eggs can persist in cold climates, but whether sex is obligate or facultative depending on climatic conditions remains to be elucidated. In this study, we have inferred the reproductive mode of introduced populations of the pea aphid

Indexed as

asexualityinvasion biologymaintenance of sexpea aphid

Identifiers

PMID32788979
PMCPMC7417215
OpenAlexW3043317374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.