Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32788526›Full record

ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2021

Effects of Newly Developed Right Versus Left Bundle Branch Block on the QRS Axis, T-wave Axis and Frontal QRS-T Angle in Patients with a Narrow QRS.

Satoshi Kurisu, Kazuhiro Nitta, Noriaki Watanabe, Hiroki Ikenaga, Ken Ishibashi, Yukihiro Fukuda, Yukiko Nakano

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Satoshi KurisuDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Japan.
Kazuhiro NittaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Japan.
Noriaki WatanabeDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Japan.
Hiroki IkenagaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Japan.
Ken IshibashiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Japan.
Yukihiro FukudaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Japan.
Yukiko NakanoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Japan.
Hiroshima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective The QRS-T angle has been established as a repolarization marker. In the present study, we determined whether or not newly developed bundle branch block (BBB) affected the QRS-T angle in patients with a narrow QRS. Methods Twenty-four patients with newly developed BBB and no adverse cardiac events were retrospectively included. The frontal QRS-T angle was defined as the absolute value of the difference between the frontal plane QRS axis and the T-wave axis. These electrocardiogram parameters were serially measured in the settings of narrow QRS and BBB. Results Twelve patients had newly developed right BBB (RBBB), and 12 had newly developed left BBB (LBBB). The development of RBBB did not affect the QRS axis, T-wave axis of QRS-T angle (41° ±42° to 53° ±65°, p = 0.63). In contrast, the development of LBBB shifted the QRS axis to the left (25° ±29° to -18° ±31°, p = 0.003), resulting in an increased QRS-T angle (72° ±50° to 123° ±39°, p = 0.001). Regarding RBBB, an excellent correlation and agreement were found between the QRS-T angles in the setting of narrow QRS and RBBB (r = 0.88; p <0.001; bias, 2.9° ±20.9°). However, there was a significant bias between the QRS-T angles in the setting of narrow QRS and LBBB (51.9° ±40.4°; p = 0.001). Conclusion Our data suggested that the QRS-T angle in the setting of RBBB reflected the original QRS-T angle in the setting of narrow QRS well, whereas the QRS-T angle in the setting of LBBB did not.

Indexed as

Bundle-Branch BlockElectrocardiographyHumansRetrospective Studiesbundle branch blockelectrocardiogramrepolarization

Identifiers

PMID32788526
PMCPMC7835454
OpenAlexW3048457564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.