Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32788394›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

When DNA gets in the way: A cautionary note for DNA contamination in extracellular RNA-seq studies.

Jasper Verwilt, Wim Trypsteen, Ruben Van Paemel, Katleen De Preter, Maria D Giraldez, Pieter Mestdagh, Jo Vandesompele

Abstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. When DNA gets in the way: A cautionary note for DNA contamination in extracellular RNA-seq studies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  18. Reply to Verwilt et al.: Experimental evidence against DNA contamination in SILVER-seq.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jasper VerwiltDepartment of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; Jasper.verwilt@ugent.be.ORCID 0000-0001-8517-8841
Wim TrypsteenDepartment of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9066-4932
Ruben Van PaemelDepartment of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7324-3570
Katleen De PreterDepartment of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7726-5096
Maria D GiraldezDigestive Diseases Unit, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, 41013 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6829-7603
Pieter MestdaghDepartment of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7821-9684
Jo VandesompeleDepartment of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6274-0184

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

DNA ContaminationRNADNAExome SequencingHumansRNA-SeqDNARNA

Identifiers

PMID32788394
PMCPMC7431080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.