Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32788368›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Mathematical model of colorectal cancer initiation.

Chay Paterson, Hans Clevers, Ivana Bozic

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Unveiling the Molecular Repertoire ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chay PatersonDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.ORCID 0000-0001-9928-3511
Hans CleversOncode Institute, 3521 AL Utrecht, The Netherlands; h.clevers@hubrecht.eu ibozic@uw.edu.
Ivana BozicDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; h.clevers@hubrecht.eu ibozic@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2761-825X
University of Washington Applied Physics Laboratory · USRoyal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantifying evolutionary dynamics of cancer initiation and progression can provide insights into more effective strategies of early detection and treatment. Here we develop a mathematical model of colorectal cancer initiation through inactivation of two tumor suppressor genes and activation of one oncogene, accounting for the well-known path to colorectal cancer through loss of tumor suppressors

Indexed as

CarcinogenesisColonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionGenes, APCGenes, p53Genes, rasHumansModels, TheoreticalMutationMutation RateOncogenesProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Tumor Suppressor Protein p53KRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Tumor Suppressor Protein p53cancer evolutiondriver mutationsstochastic model

Identifiers

PMID32788368
PMCPMC7456111
OpenAlexW3048637028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.