Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32788365›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Neuronal spike-rate adaptation supports working memory in language processing.

Hartmut Fitz, Marvin Uhlmann, Dick van den Broek, Renato Duarte, Peter Hagoort, Karl Magnus Petersson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Neurobiological Causal Models of Language Processing.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Opening Questions in Visual Working Memory.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  10. Robust Effects of Working Memory Demand during Naturalistic Language Comprehension in Language-Selective Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hartmut FitzDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, 6500HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands; hartmut.fitz@mpi.nl peter.hagoort@mpi.nl.
Marvin UhlmannNeurobiology of Language Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 6565XD Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Dick van den BroekNeurobiology of Language Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 6565XD Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1861-2956
Renato DuarteInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Jülich Research Centre, 52425 Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6099-667X
Peter HagoortDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, 6500HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands; hartmut.fitz@mpi.nl peter.hagoort@mpi.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-7280-7549
Karl Magnus PeterssonDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, 6500HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Language processing involves the ability to store and integrate pieces of information in working memory over short periods of time. According to the dominant view, information is maintained through sustained, elevated neural activity. Other work has argued that short-term synaptic facilitation can serve as a substrate of memory. Here we propose an account where memory is supported by intrinsic plasticity that downregulates neuronal firing rates. Single neuron responses are dependent on experience, and we show through simulations that these adaptive changes in excitability provide memory on timescales ranging from milliseconds to seconds. On this account, spiking activity writes information into coupled dynamic variables that control adaptation and move at slower timescales than the membrane potential. From these variables, information is continuously read back into the active membrane state for processing. This neuronal memory mechanism does not rely on persistent activity, excitatory feedback, or synaptic plasticity for storage. Instead, information is maintained in adaptive conductances that reduce firing rates and can be accessed directly without cued retrieval. Memory span is systematically related to both the time constant of adaptation and baseline levels of neuronal excitability. Interference effects within memory arise when adaptation is long lasting. We demonstrate that this mechanism is sensitive to context and serial order which makes it suitable for temporal integration in sequence processing within the language domain. We also show that it enables the binding of linguistic features over time within dynamic memory registers. This work provides a step toward a computational neurobiology of language.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansLanguageMemory, Short-TermModels, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsSynapsesneuronal plasticitysequence processingworking memory

Identifiers

PMID32788365
PMCPMC7456144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.