Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32788357›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Mismatch sensing by nucleofilament deciphers mechanism of RecA-mediated homologous recombination.

Xingyuan Huang, Ying Lu, Shuang Wang, Mingyu Sui, Jinghua Li, Jianbing Ma, Dongfei Ma, Qi Jia, Shuxin Hu, Chunhua Xu and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. NProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Crystal Structure of the Recombination Mediator Protein RecO fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xingyuan HuangBeijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100190 Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4575-0772
Ying LuBeijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100190 Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8421-7228
Shuang WangBeijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100190 Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3879-9519
Mingyu SuiSchool of Physical Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, 730000 Lanzhou, Gansu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5835-7246
Jinghua LiBeijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100190 Beijing, China.
Jianbing MaBeijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100190 Beijing, China.
Dongfei MaBeijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100190 Beijing, China.
Qi JiaBeijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100190 Beijing, China.
Shuxin HuBeijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100190 Beijing, China.
Chunhua XuBeijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100190 Beijing, China; xch@iphy.ac.cn mingli@iphy.ac.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-5352-1553
Ming LiBeijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100190 Beijing, China; xch@iphy.ac.cn mingli@iphy.ac.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-5328-5826
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNLanzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recombinases polymerize along single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) at the end of a broken DNA to form a helical nucleofilament with a periodicity of ∼18 bases. The filament catalyzes the search and checking for homologous sequences and promotes strand exchange with a donor duplex during homologous recombination (HR), the mechanism of which has remained mysterious since its discovery. Here, by inserting mismatched segments into donor duplexes and using single-molecule techniques to catch transient intermediates in HR, we found that, even though 3 base pairs (bp) is still the basic unit, both the homology checking and the strand exchange may proceed in multiple steps at a time, resulting in ∼9-bp large steps on average. More interestingly, the strand exchange is blocked remotely by the mismatched segment, terminating at positions ∼9 bp before the match-mismatch joint. The homology checking and the strand exchange are thus separated in space, with the strand exchange lagging behind. Our data suggest that the strand exchange progresses like a traveling wave in which the donor DNA is incorporated successively into the ssDNA-RecA filament to check homology in ∼9-bp steps in the frontier, followed by a hypothetical transitional segment and then the post-strand-exchanged duplex.

Indexed as

Base Pair MismatchHomologous RecombinationDeoxyribonucleasesDNA-Binding ProteinsEscherichia coli ProteinsRec A RecombinasesDeoxyribonucleasesDNA-Binding ProteinsEscherichia coli ProteinsrecA protein, E coliRec A Recombinasesdynamic configurationhomologous recombinationmolecular mechanismRecAstrand exchange

Identifiers

PMID32788357
PMCPMC7456136
OpenAlexW3048446799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.