ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2020
Genomic Studies Reveal Substantial Dominant Effects and Improved Genomic Predictions in an Open-Pollinated Breeding Population of
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative assessment of floral bud morphological differences among three eucalyptus species and their potential relationship on hybrid pollination.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Quantifying genetic and genotypic gain gaps in Eucalyptus: the hidden cost of ignoring inbreeding and dominance.Heredity · 2025Article
- Forest tree breeding using genomic Markov causal models: a new approach to genomic tree breeding improvement.Heredity · 2025Article
- Metagenome-enabled models improve genomic predictive ability and identification of herbivory-limiting genes in sweetpotato.Horticulture research · 2024Article
- Genomic evaluation for breeding and genetic management in Cordia africana, a multipurpose tropical tree species.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Genomic studies of the additive and dominant genetic control on production traits of Euterpe edulis fruits.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Increasing genomic prediction accuracy for unphenotyped full-sib families by modeling additive and dominance effects with large datasets in white spruce.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Article
- Accounting for population structure in genomic predictions of Eucalyptus globulus.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Article
- Achievements and Challenges of Genomics-Assisted Breeding in Forest Trees: From Marker-Assisted Selection to Genome Editing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Single-step genomic BLUP enables joint analysis of disconnected breeding programs: an example with Eucalyptus globulus Labill.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
- Chromosome-specific polymorphic SSR markers in tropical eucalypt species using low coverage whole genome sequences: systematic characterization and validation.Genomics & informatics · 2021Article
- Single-step genomic prediction of Eucalyptus dunnii using different identity-by-descent and identity-by-state relationship matrices.Heredity · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most of the genomic studies in plants and animals have used additive models for studying genetic parameters and prediction accuracies. In this study, we used genomic models with additive and nonadditive effects to analyze the genetic architecture of growth and wood traits in an open-pollinated (OP) population of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.