Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32788191›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

COVID-19 emergency response assessment study: a prospective longitudinal survey of frontline doctors in the UK and Ireland: study protocol.

Tom Roberts, Jo Daniels, William Hulme, Daniel Horner, Mark David Lyttle, Katie Samuel, Blair Graham, Robert Hirst, Charles Reynard, Michael Barrett and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The impact of the prolonged COVID-19 pandemic on stress resilience and mental health: A critical review across waves.European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tom RobertsTrainee Emergency Research Network, The Royal College of Emergency Medicine, London, UK tomkieranroberts@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4991-974X
Jo DanielsDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, UK.
William HulmeStatistical Consultant, Oxford, UK.
Daniel HornerTrainee Emergency Research Network, The Royal College of Emergency Medicine, London, UK.
Mark David LyttleEmergency Department, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8634-7210
Katie SamuelDepartment of Anaesthesia, North Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, Bristol, UK.
Blair GrahamFaculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, UK.
Robert HirstDepartment of Anaesthesia, North Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, Bristol, UK.
Charles ReynardDepartment of Cardviovascular Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Michael BarrettSchool of Medicine, Women's and Children's Health, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-1775-8347
Edward CarltonTrainee Emergency Research Network, The Royal College of Emergency Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health NIHR300246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic is putting an unprecedented strain on healthcare systems globally. The psychological impact on frontline doctors of dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic is currently unknown. This longitudinal professional survey aims to understand the evolving and cumulative effects of working during the COVID-19 outbreak on the psychological well-being of doctors working in emergency departments (ED), intensive care units (ICU) and anaesthetics during the pandemic. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a longitudinal questionnaire-based study with three predefined time points spanning the acceleration, peak and deceleration phases of the COVID-19 pandemic.The primary outcomes are psychological distress and post-trauma stress as measured by the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) and Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R). Data related to personal and professional characteristics will also be collected. Questionnaires will be administered prospectively to all doctors working in ED, ICU and anaesthetics in the UK and Ireland via existing research networks during the sampling period. Data from the questionnaires will be analysed to assess the prevalence and degree of psychological distress and trauma, and the nature of the relationship between personal and professional characteristics and the primary outcomes. Data will be described, analysed and disseminated at each time point; however, the primary endpoint will be psychological distress and trauma at the final time point. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Bath, UK (ref: 4421), and Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin, Ethics Committee. Regulatory approval from the Health Regulation Authority (UK), Health and Care Research Wales (IRAS: 281944).This study is limited by the fact that it focuses on doctors only and is survey based without further qualitative interviews of participants. It is expected this study will provide clear evidence of the psychological impact of COVID-19 on doctors and will allow present and future planning to mitigate against any psychological impact. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN10666798.

Indexed as

Anesthesia Department, HospitalBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Emergency Service, HospitalHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-PatientIntensive Care UnitsIrelandLongitudinal StudiesMedical Staff, HospitalPandemicsPneumonia, ViralPrevalenceResearch DesignSARS-CoV-2accident & emergency medicineanaestheticsintensive & critical carepsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID32788191
PMCPMC7422647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.