Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32788187›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Interventions to improve the quality of cataract services: protocol for a global scoping review.

Miho Yoshizaki, Jacqueline Ramke, João M Furtado, Helen Burn, Stephen Gichuhi, Iris Gordon, Ada Aghaji, Ana P Marques, William H Dean, Nathan Congdon and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Miho YoshizakiInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK miho.yoshizaki@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0003-1893-5675
Jacqueline RamkeInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5764-1306
João M FurtadoDivision of Ophthalmology, Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Helen BurnDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, UK.
Stephen GichuhiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Iris GordonInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Ada AghajiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu, Nigeria.
Ana P MarquesInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8242-7021
William H DeanInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Nathan CongdonCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
John BuchanInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Matthew J BurtonInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBQueen's University Belfast · GBStoke Mandeville Hospital · GBUniversidade de Ribeirão Preto · BRUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Nairobi · KEUniversity of Nigeria · NG

Funding

Wellcome Trust 207472/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCataract is the leading cause of blindness globally and a major cause of vision impairment. Cataract surgery is an efficacious intervention that usually restores vision. Although it is one of the most commonly conducted surgical interventions worldwide, good quality services (from being detected with operable cataract to undergoing surgery and receiving postoperative care) are not universally accessible. Poor quality understandably reduces the willingness of people with operable cataract to undergo surgery. Therefore, it is critical to improve the quality of care to subsequently reduce vision loss from cataract. This scoping review aims to summarise the nature and extent of the published literature on interventions to improve the quality of services for primary age-related cataract globally. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search MEDLINE, Embase and Global Health for peer-reviewed manuscripts published since 1990, with no language, geographic or study design restrictions. To define quality, we have used the elements adopted by the WHO-effectiveness, safety, people-centredness, timeliness, equity, integration and efficiency-to which we have added the element of planetary health. We will exclude studies focused on the technical aspects of the surgical procedure and studies that only involve children (<18 years). Two reviewers will screen all titles/abstracts independently, followed by a full-text review of potentially relevant articles. For included articles, data regarding publication characteristics, study details and quality-related outcomes will be extracted by two reviewers independently. Results will be synthesised narratively and presented visually using a spider chart. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was not sought, as our review will only include published and publicly accessible information. We will publish our findings in an open-access peer-reviewed journal and develop an accessible summary of the results for website posting. A summary of the results will be included in the ongoing REGISTRATION DETAILS: Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/8gktz).

Indexed as

CataractCataract ExtractionChildDelivery of Health CareGlobal HealthHumansScoping Reviews as TopicVision, Ocularcataract and refractive surgeryhealth policyquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID32788187
PMCPMC7422650
OpenAlexW3048834103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.