Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32788184›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Consensus statement: loneliness in older adults, the 21st century social determinant of health?

Thomas Prohaska, Vanessa Burholt, Annette Burns, Jeannette Golden, Louise Hawkley, Brian Lawlor, Gerard Leavey, Jim Lubben, Roger O'Sullivan, Carla Perissinotto and 4 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Understanding the Association Between Substance Use and Loneliness in Midlife and Older Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Thomas ProhaskaCollege of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.
Vanessa BurholtSchool of Nursing/School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Annette BurnsInstitute of Public Health in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Jeannette GoldenMercer's Institute for Successful Ageing, Saint James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Louise HawkleyAcademic Research Centers, NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Brian LawlorGlobal Brain Health Institute, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Gerard LeaveyBamford Centre for Mental Health and Well Being, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8411-8919
Jim LubbenSchool of Social Work, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA.
Roger O'SullivanInstitute of Public Health in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland roger.osullivan@publichealth.ie.ORCID 0000-0001-6433-8404
Carla PerissinottoDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Theo van TilburgDepartment of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark TullySchool of Health Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.
Christina VictorCollege of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University, London, UK.
Linda FriedMailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this consensus statement is to determine the state of the field of loneliness among older people, highlighting key issues for researchers, policymakers and those designing services and interventions.

methodsIn December 2018, an international meeting on loneliness was held in Belfast with leaders from across the USA and Europe. A summary of the conclusions reached at this event is presented following a consensus-building exercise conducted both during this event after each presentation as well as after the event through the drafting, reviewing and agreement of this statement by all authors for over 6 months.

resultsThis meeting resulted in an agreement to produce a consensus statement on key issues including definitions of loneliness, measurement, antecedents, consequences and interventions. DISCUSSION: There has been an exponential growth in research on loneliness among older adults. However, differing measurements and definitions of loneliness mean the incidence and prevalence, associated risk factors and health consequences are often conflicting or confusing especially for those developing policy and services.

Indexed as

LonelinessSocial Determinants of HealthAgedAged, 80 and overEuropeExerciseHumansRisk Factorsgeriatric medicineold age psychiatrypublic health

Identifiers

PMID32788184
PMCPMC7422633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.