ArticleVaccine2020
Vaccine safety surveillance informs public health policy beyond immunization: A case-series on bleeding following vaccination, Nepal, 2016-2018.
Article in Vaccine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSurveillance for adverse events following immunization (AEFI) is important to monitor vaccine safety and should lead to appropriate responses to improve health and immunization program. Bleeding following vaccination is not recognized as an important AEFI. Without policy of vitamin K (VK) prophylaxis at birth, vitamin K deficiency bleeding (VKDB) could be an important cause of bleeding in young infants and may manifest as AEFI.
methodsWe retrospectively analysed all serious AEFI cases that presented with external or internal bleeding reported to Nepal's AEFI surveillance system during 2016-2018. The cases were classified as VKDB, suspected VKDB or non-VKDB.
resultsDuring the period, 16 serious AEFI with symptom or sign of bleeding were reported representing 21.3% of all serious AEFI reported. Cases were between 40 and 94 days of age. The National AEFI Investigation Committee classified all cases as coincidental. Fourteen cases (87.5%) had bleeding from injection site. Median time from vaccination to injection site bleeding was 4.3 h (interquartile range: 2.1-11.6 h). Six cases (37.5%) had intra-cranial haemorrhage. Only one case had confirmed history of receiving VK at birth. Ten cases (62.5%) received appropriate treatment (VK injection; blood transfusion if needed). Based on limited laboratory investigations available, three cases (18.75%) could be classified as late onset VKDB and 11 cases (68.75%) as suspected late onset VKDB.
conclusionVKDB should be suspected in young infants presenting with bleeding including following vaccination, and prompt treatment should be initiated. Bleeding following vaccination should be recognized as an important AEFI as even a small amount of blood loss in young infants can be catastrophic. We posit that this series is a small subset of VKDB cases in Nepal detected through AEFI surveillance system. In countries without policy of VK prophylaxis at birth including Nepal, the policy should be introduced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.