Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32787963›Full record

ArticleJournal of ovarian research2020

Transcriptomics of cumulus cells - a window into oocyte maturation in humans.

Brandon A Wyse, Noga Fuchs Weizman, Seth Kadish, Hanna Balakier, Mugundhine Sangaralingam, Clifford L Librach

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Expression ofInternational journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2025
    Article
  6. A Comparative Analysis ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Influence of Long Non-Coding RNAs on Human Oocyte Development.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brandon A WyseCReATe Fertility Centre, 790 Bay St. Suite 420, Toronto, ON, M5G 1N8, Canada. brandon@createivf.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9266-1962
Noga Fuchs WeizmanCReATe Fertility Centre, 790 Bay St. Suite 420, Toronto, ON, M5G 1N8, Canada.
Seth KadishCReATe Fertility Centre, 790 Bay St. Suite 420, Toronto, ON, M5G 1N8, Canada.
Hanna BalakierCReATe Fertility Centre, 790 Bay St. Suite 420, Toronto, ON, M5G 1N8, Canada.
Mugundhine SangaralingamCReATe Fertility Centre, 790 Bay St. Suite 420, Toronto, ON, M5G 1N8, Canada.
Clifford L LibrachCReATe Fertility Centre, 790 Bay St. Suite 420, Toronto, ON, M5G 1N8, Canada.
CReATe Fertility Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCumulus cells (CC) encapsulate growing oocytes and support their growth and development. Transcriptomic signatures of CC have the potential to serve as valuable non-invasive biomarkers for oocyte competency and potential. The present sibling cumulus-oocyte-complex (COC) cohort study aimed at defining functional variations between oocytes of different maturity exposed to the same stimulation conditions, by assessing the transcriptomic signatures of their corresponding CC. CC were collected from 18 patients with both germinal vesicle and metaphase II oocytes from the same cycle to keep the biological variability between samples to a minimum. RNA sequencing, differential expression, pathway analysis, and leading-edge were performed to highlight functional differences between CC encapsulating oocytes of different maturity.

resultsTranscriptomic signatures representing CC encapsulating oocytes of different maturity clustered separately on principal component analysis with 1818 genes differentially expressed. CCs encapsulating mature oocytes were more transcriptionally synchronized when compared with CCs encapsulating immature oocytes. Moreover, the transcriptional activity was lower, albeit not absent, in CC encapsulating mature oocytes, with 2407 fewer transcripts detected than in CC encapsulating immature (germinal vesicle - GV) oocytes. Hallmark pathways and ovarian processes that were affected by oocyte maturity included cell cycle regulation, steroid metabolism, apoptosis, extracellular matrix remodeling, and inflammation.

conclusionsHerein we review our findings and discuss how they align with previous literature addressing transcriptomic signatures of oocyte maturation. Our findings support the available literature and enhance it with several genes and pathways, which have not been previously implicated in promoting human oocyte maturation. This study lays the ground for future functional studies that can enhance our understanding of human oocyte maturation.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksAdultCohort StudiesCumulus CellsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMetaphaseOocytesPrincipal Component AnalysisSequence Analysis, RNAAssisted reproductive technologyCumulus cellsCumulus-oocyte complexGene expressionOocyte maturation

Identifiers

PMID32787963
PMCPMC7425158
OpenAlexW3048926192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.