Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32787962›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2020

The role of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in complicated knee arthroplasty: relevance of gentamicin allergy and benefit from revision surgery - a case control follow-up study and algorithmic approach.

Benjamin Thomas, Maria Benedikt, Ali Alamri, Florian Kapp, Rainer Bader, Burkhard Summer, Peter Thomas, Eva Oppel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin ThomasDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Frauenlobstrasse 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany. benjamin.felix.thomas@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4185-178X
Maria BenediktDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Frauenlobstrasse 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany.
Ali AlamriDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Frauenlobstrasse 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany.
Florian KappDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Frauenlobstrasse 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany.
Rainer BaderDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Rostock, Doberaner Strasse 142, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Burkhard SummerDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Frauenlobstrasse 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany.
Peter ThomasDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Frauenlobstrasse 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany.
Eva OppelDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Frauenlobstrasse 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEHeidelberg University · DETUM Klinikum · DEUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

Deutsche Arthrose-Hilfe e.V. (DE) 2014:15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotic-loaded (particularly gentamicin) bone cement (BC) is widely used in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) to prevent periprosthetic infections (PPIs), but may itself cause implant failure. In light of a complete lack in literature, the objective was to assess the clinical relevance of gentamicin allergy for failure of cemented total knee arthroplasties in 25 out of 250 patients with positive patch test reactions to gentamicin and otherwise unexplained symptoms by evaluating benefits from revision with change to gentamicin-free cement.

methodsFifteen of these 25 patients and their treating orthopaedic surgeons agreed to a re-assessment. They were surveyed regarding interim course of therapy and symptoms, including re-assessment of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and underwent follow-up clinical and radiographic investigations. The initial use of gentamicin-loaded BC was reaffirmed by review of the primary implantation operative reports and respective implant passports. Primary and follow-up KOOS scores were analyzed regarding benefits from revision surgery by comparing nine patients with revision to six without revision.

resultsMean follow-up time was 38 months. The entirety of patients experienced an improvement of self-reported symptoms, with revision surgery (i.e., switching to gentamicin-free BC or uncemented total knee arthroplasty) yielding significantly greater improvement (p = 0.031): the nine revised patients reported a significant symptom relief (p = 0.028), contrary to the six unrevised patients (p = 0.14). Interestingly, the decision to proceed with revision surgery was significantly correlated with higher symptom severity (p = 0.05).

conclusionIn symptomatic total knee arthroplasty with gentamicin allergy, uncemented revision arthroplasty or change to gentamicin-free BC provides significant symptom relief.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeReoperationAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBone CementsDrug HypersensitivityFemaleGentamicinsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis FailureProsthesis-Related InfectionsRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBone CementsGentamicinsAllergyBone cementGentamicinImplant failureRevisionTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID32787962
PMCPMC7425164
OpenAlexW3048860480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.