ArticleImplementation science : IS2020
Protocol for the 3HP Options Trial: a hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness randomized trial of delivery strategies for short-course tuberculosis preventive therapy among people living with HIV in Uganda.
Article in Implementation science : IS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03934931 (Options for Delivering Isoniazid-Rifapentine), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Options for Delivering Isoniazid-Rifapentine (3HP) for TB Prevention: the 3HP Options Implementation Trial
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Trial
- Predicted choice and acceptability of regimens for tuberculosis preventive treatment among people living with HIV in Uganda - A discrete choice experiment.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- A study protocol on assessing the acceptance and effectiveness of a digital adherence technology for TB preventive treatment in Bangladesh.BMC public health · 2025Observational
- Preferences of people living with HIV for features of tuberculosis preventive treatment regimens in Uganda: a discrete choice experiment.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2024Article
- Adverse Events Reported During Weekly Isoniazid-Rifapentine (3HP) Tuberculosis Preventive Treatment Among People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Uganda.Open forum infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Evaluating the implementation of weekly rifapentine-isoniazid (3HP) for tuberculosis prevention among people living with HIV in Uganda: A qualitative evaluation of the 3HP Options Trial.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Adverse events reported during weekly isoniazid-rifapentine (3HP) tuberculosis preventive treatment among people living with HIV in Uganda.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Preference for daily (1HP) vs. weekly (3HP) isoniazid-rifapentine among people living with HIV in Uganda.IJTLD open · 2024Article
- A broader evaluation of vaccine-induced T cell immunity against tuberculosis.Frontiers in tuberculosis · 2024Article
- Evaluating the implementation of weekly rifapentine-isoniazid (3HP) for tuberculosis prevention among people living with HIV in Uganda: A qualitative evaluation of the 3HP Options Trial.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Preferences of people living with HIV for features of tuberculosis preventive treatment regimens - a discrete choice experiment.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Understanding patient-level costs of weekly isoniazid-rifapentine (3HP) among people living with HIV in Uganda.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2023Article
- Ending tuberculosis in a post-COVID-19 world: a person-centred, equity-oriented approach.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2023Review
- Design and management considerations for control groups in hybrid effectiveness-implementation trials: Narrative review & case studies.Frontiers in health services · 2023Review
- Acceptance and completion of rifapentine-based TB preventive therapy (3HP) among people living with HIV (PLHIV) in Kampala, Uganda-patient and health worker perspectives.Implementation science communications · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecently, a 3-month (12-dose) regimen of weekly isoniazid and rifapentine (3HP) was recommended by the World Health Organization for the prevention of tuberculosis (TB) among people living with HIV (PLHIV) on common antiretroviral therapy regimens. The best approach to delivering 3HP to PLHIV remains uncertain.
methodsWe developed a three-armed randomized trial assessing optimized strategies for delivering 3HP to PLHIV. The trial will be conducted at the Mulago Immune Suppression Syndrome (i.e., HIV/AIDS) clinic in Kampala, Uganda. We plan to recruit 1656 PLHIV, randomized 1:1 to each of the three arms (552 per arm). Using a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation design, this pragmatic trial aims to (1) compare the acceptance and completion of 3HP among PLHIV under three delivery strategies: directly observed therapy (DOT), self-administered therapy (SAT), and informed patient choice of either DOT or SAT (with the assistance of a decision aid); (2) to identify processes and contextual factors that influence the acceptance and completion of 3HP under each delivery strategy; and (3) to estimate the costs and compare the cost-effectiveness of three strategies for delivering 3HP. The three delivery strategies were each optimized to address key barriers to 3HP completion using a theory-informed approach. We hypothesize that high levels of treatment acceptance and completion can be achieved among PLHIV in sub-Saharan Africa and that offering PLHIV an informed choice between the optimized DOT and SAT delivery strategies will result in greater acceptance and completion of 3HP. The design and planned evaluation of the delivery strategies were guided by the use of implementation science conceptual frameworks. DISCUSSION: 3HP-one of the most promising interventions for TB prevention-will not be scaled up unless it can be delivered in a patient-centered fashion. We highlight shared decision-making as a key element of our trial design and theorize that offering PLHIV an informed choice between optimized delivery strategies will facilitate the highest levels of treatment acceptance and completion.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03934931 ; Registered 2 May 2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.