ArticleBMC women's health2020
"You better use the safer one… leave this one": the role of health providers in women's pursuit of their preferred family planning methods.
Article in BMC women's health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors Influencing Community Members' Perception of Primary Health Care Services Delivered by Community Health Workers in Rural Areas: A Systematic Review.The Australian journal of rural health · 2026Pooled it
- Postpartum Intrauterine Device Removal and Access to Removal in the 18 Months Following an Intervention in Tanzania, Sri Lanka, and Nepal.Studies in family planning · 2026Trial
- Barriers and facilitators to potential nationwide implementation of fertility health awareness strategies in young married couples in Singapore: an implementation study.BMC health services research · 2025Trial
- The effect of a postpartum intrauterine device programme on choice of contraceptive method in Tanzania: a secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized trial.Health policy and planning · 2023Trial
- When choice is not performative: the struggle for agency among women accessing family planning services in Senegal.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
- Empowerment Model for The Elderly and Community to Improve the Welfare of the Elderly.F1000Research · 2026Article
- Article
- Operationalizing Client-Centered Care: A Strategic Framework and Measurement Approach to Guide Sexual and Reproductive Health Programming.Global health, science and practice · 2025Article
- A multilevel analysis on the predictors of client satisfaction with family planning services in Ethiopia: evidence from the Ethiopian service provision assessment (ESPA) 2021/22.Global health action · 2025Article
- Thirty years of 'strange bedmates': The ICPD and the nexus of population control, feminism, and family planning.Population studies · 2025Article
- Understanding women's preferences for long-acting reversible contraceptives in Gondar, Ethiopia: a discrete choice experiment.Health economics review · 2025Article
- Provider confidence and willingness to insert and remove long-acting reversible contraception methods in Kenyan public facilities.Contraception · 2025Article
- Readiness of health facilities to deliver family planning services and associated factors in urban east-central Uganda.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Contraceptive Use and Discontinuation Among Adolescent Women in 55 Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Demography · 2025Article
- Factors associated with modern contraceptive use among sexually active youths attending secondary schools in Mbale City, Uganda.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Keeping the "R" in LARC (long-acting reversible contraception): Measuring client-centered implant removal services in sub-Saharan Africa.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- [Analysis of the reports of contraceptive service providers in Mexico: between reproductive autonomy and contraceptive coercion].Cadernos de saude publica · 2025Article
- Thirty years after the Cairo declaration on population & development: have family planning measurements caught up?Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
- Examining the low uptake of LARC in Ethiopia: an analysis of individual-level predisposing and enabling factors.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
- Contraceptive Care Visit Objectives and Outcomes: Evidence From Burkina Faso, Pakistan, and Tanzania.Studies in family planning · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUniversal access to quality sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services is pivotal to ensuring gender equality. In high-income countries, patient-provider interactions have been shown to shape women's decisions about contraception, with poor exchanges decreasing method uptake and satisfaction. While significant progress has been made to increase women's access to SRH services, in low- and middle-income countries, little is known about the quality of family planning patient-provider interactions. The primary objective of this analysis was to explore the role of health care providers in women's family planning decision-making in Ethiopia.
methodsFrom July to August 2017, 10 focus group discussions (n = 80) and 30 in-depth interviews were conducted with women aged 15-49 and men aged 18+ recruited via purposive sampling from urban and rural sites in Ethiopia. Semi-structured interview guides explored women's and girls' empowerment in SRH surrounding sex, childbearing, and contraception. All interviews were conducted in Amharic, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim into English. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze data. Eleven codes specific to provider services for family planning were reviewed and matrixes creates for synthesis.
resultsThree primary themes emerged: the role of providers in women's awareness of and demand for family planning services; selection and uptake of contraceptive methods; and discontinuation and switching of contraceptive methods. Results indicate that health extension workers were central to women's awareness of family planning, and health providers' endorsements were instrumental in decisions to adopt methods. The majority of respondents described positive interactions with providers and appreciated thorough counseling when considering using or switching methods. Some women, however, described health providers directing them toward long-acting methods by communicating inaccurate information or emphasizing disadvantages of short-acting methods. A few women described provider reluctance or resistance to switching methods, especially from implants.
conclusionsWomen shared many narratives about the central roles health providers played in their awareness and decision-making for family planning. Those narratives also included provider bias against women's preferred methods. Further research and program assessments are needed to ascertain the extent to which these biases hinder women's decision-making autonomy in using contraception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.