Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32787864›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2020

When to call it off: defining transplant candidacy limits in liver donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Abu Bakar Hafeez Bhatti, Ammal Imran Qureshi, Rizmi Tahir, Faisal Saud Dar, Nusrat Yar Khan, Haseeb Haider Zia, Shahzad Riyaz, Atif Rana

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abu Bakar Hafeez BhattiDivision of Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan. abubakar.hafeez@shifa.com.pk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4875-603X
Ammal Imran QureshiDivision of Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Rizmi TahirDivision of Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Faisal Saud DarDivision of Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Nusrat Yar KhanDivision of Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Haseeb Haider ZiaDivision of Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Shahzad RiyazDivision of Transplant Hepatology, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Atif RanaDivision of Radiology, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Shifa International Hospital · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiving donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an acceptable treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Traditional transplant criteria aim at best utilization of donor organs with low risk of post transplant recurrence. In LDLT, long term recurrence free survival (RFS) of 50% is considered acceptable. The objective of the current study was to determine preoperative factors associated with high recurrence rates in LDLT.

methodsBetween April 2012 and December 2019, 898 LDLTs were performed at our center. Out of these, 242 were confirmed to have HCC on explant histopathology. We looked at preoperative factors associated with ≤ 50%RFS at 4 years. For survival analysis, Kaplan Meier curves were used and Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of recurrence.

resultsMedian AFP was 14.4(0.7-11,326.7) ng/ml. Median tumor size was 2.8(range = 0.1-11) cm and tumor number was 2(range = 1-15). On multivariate analysis, AFP > 600 ng/ml [HR:6, CI: 1.9-18.4, P = 0.002] and microvascular invasion (MVI) [HR:5.8, CI: 2.5-13.4, P <  0.001] were independent predictors of 4 year RFS ≤ 50%. When AFP was > 600 ng/ml, MVI was seen in 88.9% tumors with poor grade and 75% of tumors outside University of California San Francisco criteria. Estimated 4 year RFS was 78% for the entire cohort. When AFP was < 600 ng/ml, 4 year RFS for well-moderate and poor grade tumors was 88 and 73%. With AFP > 600 ng/ml, RFS was 53% and 0 with well-moderate and poor grade tumors respectively (P <  0.001).

conclusionPatients with AFP < 600 ng/ml have acceptable outcomes after LDLT. In patients with AFP > 600 ng/ml, a preoperative biopsy to rule out poor differentiation should be considered for patient selection.

Indexed as

Liver TransplantationLiving DonorsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAdultAgedalpha-FetoproteinsCarcinoma, HepatocellularFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionPreoperative CareRegression Analysisalpha-FetoproteinsAFPLiver transplantationMicrovascular invasionRecurrenceUCSF criteria

Identifiers

PMID32787864
PMCPMC7425141
OpenAlexW3048519212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.