Observational studyBMC cancer2020
Impact on quality of life 3 years after diagnosis of prostate cancer patients below 75 at diagnosis: an observational case-control study.
Observational study in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02854982 (Impact on Quality of Life 3 Years After Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact on Quality of Life 3 Years After Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality of services and patient reported outcomes for prostate cancer in Tanzania: the role of patients' satisfaction from a cross-sectional study.BMC urology · 2026Article
- Investigation of the antitumor effects of deferasirox on prostate cancer cells: insights into proliferation, apoptosis, and invasion mechanisms.Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
- Fatigue Level Associated with Quality of Life for Prostate Cancer Patients: Results from the All of Us Research Program.Cancers · 2025Article
- 'Beyond Treatment': Clinical and psychosocial predictors of health-related quality of life of patients with prostate cancer.SAGE open medicine · 2025Article
- CircBIRC6 affects prostate cancer progression by regulating miR-574-5p and DNAJB1.Cancer biology & therapy · 2024Article
- Glycoprofiling of proteins as prostate cancer biomarkers: A multinational population study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Complex implementation factors demonstrated when evaluating cost-effectiveness and monitoring racial disparities associated with [Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Effects of stigma, anxiety and depression, and uncertainty in illness on quality of life in patients with prostate cancer: a cross-sectional analysis.BMC psychology · 2023Article
- Development and external validation of multivariate prediction models for erectile dysfunction in men with localized prostate cancer.PloS one · 2023Article
- A comparison of machine learning models for predicting urinary incontinence in men with localized prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Application Effect of Bladder Function Training Combined with Kangaiping Pills on Permanent Bladder Stoma after Radical Prostatectomy.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Up-Regulation of LINC00665 Facilitates the Malignant Progression of Prostate Cancer by Epigenetically Silencing KLF2 Through EZH2 and LSD1.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- PSA Based Biomarkers, Imagistic Techniques and Combined Tests for a Better Diagnostic of Localized Prostate Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProstate cancer patients are known to suffer from poor sexual and urinary long-term side-effects following treatment, potentially impacting quality of life. The purpose of our study was to compare health-related quality of life at 3 years between prostate cancer patients and healthy controls according to key life-style characteristics. Secondary objectives were to compare urological dysfunction, sexual function, anxiety and depression.
methodsMulticentric, case-control, observational prospective, open, follow-up study including 819 prostate cancer patients < 75 years old from the EPICAP cohort, newly diagnosed from 1 December 2011 to 31 March 2014 and 879 healthy controls. Participants were excluded if they experienced a relapse. Controls from the same geographical region were age-matched and were excluded if they were diagnosed with prostate cancer. Patients received one of the following treatments: active surveillance (AS), radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), High-intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU), chemotherapy (CT), or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as appropriate. The primary outcome was the quality of life as evaluated by the QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Scores were analyzed by multivariate analysis to adjust for predefined socio-demographic confounding effects.
resultsIn total, 564 participants were included (mean age 67.9 years): 376 patients and 188 controls. Treatment breakdown was: 258 underwent RP, 90 received EBRT, 52 brachytherapy or HIFU, 15 CT, 26 ADT and 61 AS. There was no difference in median global quality of life between patients and controls (94.87 vs 94.15, p = 0.71). Multivariate analysis showed poorer social functioning in patients (24.3% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.0209), more dyspnea (22% vs. 12.4%, p = 0.0078), and yet less current pain (23% vs 33%, p = 0.0151).
conclusionsGlobal health status score at 3 years after diagnosis was similar between patients and controls, though patients showed a significantly worse social functioning. Prostate cancer diagnosis per se does not seem to impact the quality of life of patients < 75 years at diagnosis. However, the therapeutic option that will be chosen following diagnosis should be carefully discussed with the medical staff in terms of benefit-risk ratios as it could have a long-term impact on urinary or erectile dysfunction.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, NCT02854982 . Registered 4 August 2016, retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.