Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32787787›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2020

Evaluation of comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients undergoing pacemaker implantation.

Andreas W Schoenenberger, Ian Russi, Benjamin Berte, Vanessa Weberndörfer, Renate Schoenenberger-Berzins, Piotr Chodup, Remo Beeler, Florim Cuculi, Stefan Toggweiler, Richard Kobza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andreas W SchoenenbergerDepartment of Geriatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Ian RussiHeart Center Lucerne, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6000, Lucerne 16, Switzerland.
Benjamin BerteHeart Center Lucerne, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6000, Lucerne 16, Switzerland.
Vanessa WeberndörferHeart Center Lucerne, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6000, Lucerne 16, Switzerland.
Renate Schoenenberger-BerzinsDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Piotr ChodupHeart Center Lucerne, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6000, Lucerne 16, Switzerland.
Remo BeelerHeart Center Lucerne, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6000, Lucerne 16, Switzerland.
Florim CuculiHeart Center Lucerne, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6000, Lucerne 16, Switzerland.
Stefan ToggweilerHeart Center Lucerne, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6000, Lucerne 16, Switzerland.
Richard KobzaHeart Center Lucerne, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6000, Lucerne 16, Switzerland. richard.kobza@luks.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-3988-7262

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study evaluated the use of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in older patients undergoing pacemaker implantation.

methodsIn this prospective cohort, CGA was performed in 197 patients ≥75 years at pacemaker implantation and yearly thereafter. CGA embraced the following domains: cognition, mobility, nutrition, activities of daily living (ADLs), and falls (with or without loss of consciousness). Based on comorbidities, the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was calculated. For predictive analysis, logistic regression was used.

resultsDuring a mean follow-up duration of 2.4 years, the incidence rates of syncope decreased from 0.46 to 0.04 events per year (p < 0.001), and that of falls without loss of consciousness from 0.27 to 0.15 (p < 0.001) before vs. after implantation. Sixty-three patients (32.0%) died. Impaired mobility (OR 2.60, 95%CI 1.22-5.54, p = 0.013), malnutrition (OR 3.26, 95%CI 1.52-7.01, p = 0.002), and a higher CCI (OR per point increase 1.25, 95%CI 1.04-1.50, p = 0.019) at baseline were significant predictors of mortality. Among 169 patients who survived for more than 1 year and thus underwent follow-up CGA, CGA domains did not deteriorate during follow-up, except for ADLs. This decline in ADLs during follow-up was the strongest predictor of later nursing home admission (OR 9.29, 95%CI 1.82-47.49, p = 0.007). Higher baseline age (OR per year increase 1.10, 95%CI 1.02-1.20, p = 0.018) and a higher baseline CCI (OR per point increase 1.32, 95%CI 1.05-1.65, p = 0.017) were associated with a decline in ADLs during follow-up.

conclusionsCGA is useful to detect functional deficits, which are associated with mortality or nursing home admission after pacemaker implantation. The present study seems to support the use of CGA in older patients undergoing pacemaker implantation as functional deficits and falls are amenable to geriatric interventions.

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentPacemaker, ArtificialActivities of Daily LivingAgedHumansNursing HomesProspective StudiesCharlson comorbidity indexGeriatric assessmentPacemaker

Identifiers

PMID32787787
PMCPMC7424674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.