Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32787780›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2020

Differences between predicted outer membrane proteins of genotype 1 and 2 Mannheimia haemolytica.

Michael L Clawson, Gennie Schuller, Aaron M Dickey, James L Bono, Robert W Murray, Michael T Sweeney, Michael D Apley, Keith D DeDonder, Sarah F Capik, Robert L Larson and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular Epidemiology and Antibiotic Resistance of Sheep-DerivedAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Mucosal colonization ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Detection ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael L ClawsonUnited States Department of Agriculture, Genetics, Breeding, and Animal Health Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, USA. mike.clawson@usda.gov.
Gennie SchullerUnited States Department of Agriculture, Genetics, Breeding, and Animal Health Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, USA.
Aaron M DickeyUnited States Department of Agriculture, Genetics, Breeding, and Animal Health Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, USA.
James L BonoUnited States Department of Agriculture, Genetics, Breeding, and Animal Health Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, USA.
Robert W MurrayZoetis, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.
Michael T SweeneyZoetis, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.
Michael D ApleyKansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Keith D DeDonderVeterinary and Biomedical Research Center, Inc, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Sarah F CapikTexas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University System, Amarillo, TX, USA.
Robert L LarsonKansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Brian V LubbersKansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Brad J WhiteKansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Jochen BlomJustus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Hesse, Germany.
Carol G Chitko-McKownUnited States Department of Agriculture, Genetics, Breeding, and Animal Health Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, USA.
Dayna M Brichta-HarhayUnited States Department of Agriculture, Genetics, Breeding, and Animal Health Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, USA.
Timothy P L SmithUnited States Department of Agriculture, Genetics, Breeding, and Animal Health Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, USA.
Agricultural Research Service · USKansas State University · USRoman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center · USZoetis (United States) · USTexas A&M University System · USUnited States Department of Agriculture · USUniversity of Giessen · DE

Funding

Agricultural Research Service CRIS# 3040-32000-034-00D
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMannheimia haemolytica strains isolated from North American cattle have been classified into two genotypes (1 and 2). Although members of both genotypes have been isolated from the upper and lower respiratory tracts of cattle with or without bovine respiratory disease (BRD), genotype 2 strains are much more frequently isolated from diseased lungs than genotype 1 strains. The mechanisms behind the increased association of genotype 2 M. haemolytica with BRD are not fully understood. To address that, and to search for interventions against genotype 2 M. haemolytica, complete, closed chromosome assemblies for 35 genotype 1 and 34 genotype 2 strains were generated and compared. Searches were conducted for the pan genome, core genes shared between the genotypes, and for genes specific to either genotype. Additionally, genes encoding outer membrane proteins (OMPs) specific to genotype 2 M. haemolytica were identified, and the diversity of their protein isoforms was characterized with predominantly unassembled, short-read genomic sequences for up to 1075 additional strains.

resultsThe pan genome of the 69 sequenced M. haemolytica strains consisted of 3111 genes, of which 1880 comprised a shared core between the genotypes. A core of 112 and 179 genes or gene variants were specific to genotype 1 and 2, respectively. Seven genes encoding predicted OMPs; a peptidase S6, a ligand-gated channel, an autotransporter outer membrane beta-barrel domain-containing protein (AOMB-BD-CP), a porin, and three different trimeric autotransporter adhesins were specific to genotype 2 as their genotype 1 homologs were either pseudogenes, or not detected. The AOMB-BD-CP gene, however, appeared to be truncated across all examined genotype 2 strains and to likely encode dysfunctional protein. Homologous gene sequences from additional M. haemolytica strains confirmed the specificity of the remaining six genotype 2 OMP genes and revealed they encoded low isoform diversity at the population level.

conclusionGenotype 2 M. haemolytica possess genes encoding conserved OMPs not found intact in more commensally prone genotype 1 strains. Some of the genotype 2 specific genes identified in this study are likely to have important biological roles in the pathogenicity of genotype 2 M. haemolytica, which is the primary bacterial cause of BRD.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsCattleCattle DiseasesChromosomes, BacterialGenotypeMannheimia haemolyticaMutationPhylogenyRespiratory Tract InfectionsWhole Genome SequencingBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsAdhesinsBovine respiratory diseaseGenomicsGenotypesLigand-Gated ChannelMannheimia haemolyticaPeptidase S6Porin

Identifiers

PMID32787780
PMCPMC7424683
OpenAlexW3048603752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.