Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32787398›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of primary health care & family medicine2020

Coronavirus-19 and malaria: The great mimics.

Tapiwanashe Kusotera, Trust G Nhengu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of primary health care & family medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The emerging role of Deubiquitinases (DUBs) in parasites: A foresight review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Addressing Africa's pandemic puzzle: Perspectives on COVID-19 transmission and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tapiwanashe KusoteraDepartment of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare. tiranhengu@gmail.com.
Trust G Nhengu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of SARS-CoV-2 rapid diagnostic test (RDT) kits by some African countries for screening has raised serious concerns over their role in malaria areas. Coupled with a lack of adequate personal protective equipment and the scarcity of knowledge on the possible interaction between malaria and COVID-19 both in terms of presentations and shared symptoms, this has left many frontline health workers with fears and anxieties. Several anecdotal reports have already raised questions pertaining to possible false-positive COVID-19 results in proven malaria cases by use of SARS-CoV-2 RDT kits with huge costs to already constrained budgets. The report raises concerns on the use of SARS-CoV-2 kits in malaria areas in terms of cost, to prompt research, allay fears and guide policy during this pandemic and beyond.

Indexed as

AfricaClinical Laboratory TechniquesCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingDiagnosis, DifferentialFalse Positive ReactionsHumansMalariaMass ScreeningPandemicsPneumonia, ViralReagent Kits, DiagnosticReagent Kits, DiagnosticCoronavirusCOVID-19malariaSARS-CoV-2 RDT kitsscreening

Identifiers

PMID32787398
PMCPMC7479414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.