ArticleSouth African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care2020
Comparison of postpartum family planning uptake between primiparous and multiparous women in Webuye County Hospital, Kenya.
Article in South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostpartum family planning (PPFP) is associated with health, social and economic benefits to a woman and her family. Its uptake, particularly of the more effective, long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), is low. The role of parity in PPFP uptake is inconclusive. The aim of this study was to compare the uptake of PPFP and LARCs between primiparous and multiparous women accompanying their children for the first measles vaccine, which is at 9 months after delivery, in Webuye County Hospital, Kenya.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional study. Study participants were recruited using a systematic random sampling method and data were collected using a pretested, structured, interviewer-administered questionnaire. The collected data were analysed using an independent t-test to compare PPFP uptake between primiparous and multiparous women, whereas chi-square tests (for categorical data) and independent t-tests (for numerical data) were used to compare the various socio-demographic characteristics and occurrence of various predictors of PPFP uptake between the two groups of postpartum women. Factors that were significantly different between the two groups were controlled for using logistic regression.
resultsThere was a significant difference on PPFP uptake (22.0%; 95% CI: 11.8-32.3; p 0.001), but none on LARC use (OR = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.46-1.66) between the two groups of women. The unadjusted and adjusted OR for the effect of parity on FP uptake was 3.48 (95% CI: 1.88-6.42) and 2.32 (95% CI: 1.15-4.67), respectively.
conclusionThere is a significant difference in the uptake of PPFP, but not LARCs, between primiparous women and multiparous women accompanying their children for the 9-month measles vaccine in Webuye County Hospital. Primiparous women are less likely to initiate the use of PPFP compared to their multiparous counterparts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.