ArticleAccounts of chemical research2020
Increasing Complexity Approach to the Fundamental Surface and Interface Chemistry on SOFC Anode Materials.
Article in Accounts of chemical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of Co-GaCatalysis science & technology · 2025Article
- A High-Performance and Durable Direct-Ammonia Symmetrical Solid Oxide Fuel Cell with Nano LaNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ConspectusIn this Account, we demonstrate an increasing complexity approach to gain insight into the principal aspects of the surface and interface chemistry and catalysis of solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) anode and electrolyte materials based on selected oxide, intermetallic, and metal-oxide systems at different levels of material complexity, as well as into the fundamental microkinetic reaction steps and intermediates at catalytically active surface and interface sites. To dismantle the complexity, we highlight our deconstructing step-by-step approach, which allows one to deduce synergistic properties of complex composite materials from the individual surface catalytic properties of the single constituents, representing the lowest complexity level: pure oxides and pure metallic materials. Upon mixing and doping the latter, directly leading to formation of intermetallic compounds/alloys in the case of metals and oxygen ion conductors/mixed ionic and electronic conductors for oxides, a second complexity level is reached. Finally, the introduction of an (inter)metall(ic)-(mixed) oxide interface leads to the third complexity level. A shell-like model featuring three levels of complexity with the unveiled surface and interface chemistry at its core evolves. As the shift to increased complexity decreases the number of different materials, the interconnections between the studied materials become more convoluted, but the resulting picture of surface chemistry becomes clearer. The materials featured in our investigations are all either already used technologically important or prospective components of SOFCs (such as yttria-stabilized zirconia, perovskites, or Ni-Cu alloys) or their basic constituents (e.g., ZrO
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.