ArticleACS combinatorial science2020
Considerations for Achieving Maximized DNA Recovery in Solid-Phase DNA-Encoded Library Synthesis.
Article in ACS combinatorial science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated DNA-Encoded Library Synthesis and Activity-Based Screening at the Attomole Scale.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
DNA-encoded library (DEL) technology enables rapid, economical synthesis, and exploration of novel chemical space. Reaction development for DEL synthesis has recently accelerated in pace with a specific emphasis on ensuring that the reaction does not compromise the integrity of the encoding DNA. However, the factors that contribute to a reaction's "DNA compatibility" remain relatively unknown. We investigated several solid-phase reactions and encoding conditions and determined their impact on DNA compatibility. Conditions that minimized the accessibility of reactive groups on the DNA encoding tag (switching solvent, low temperature, double-stranded encoding tag) significantly improved compatibility. We showcased this approach in the multistep synthesis of an acyldepsipeptide (ADEP1) fragment, which preserved 73% of DNA for a >100-fold improvement over canonical conditions. These results are particularly encouraging in the context of multistep reaction sequences to access natural product-like scaffolds and more broadly underscore the importance of reconciling the biophysical properties and reactivity of DNA with chemistry development to yield high-quality libraries of those scaffolds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.