Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32785976›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2020

Uptake and retention on HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among key and priority populations in South-Central Uganda.

Joseph Kagaayi, James Batte, Hadijja Nakawooya, Boniface Kigozi, Gertrude Nakigozi, Susanne Strömdahl, Anna Mia Ekström, Larry W Chang, Ron Gray, Steven J Reynolds and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Retention of clients in HIV oral pre-exposure prophylaxis care in Engela, Namibia.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Joseph KagaayiRakai Health Sciences Program, Kalisizo, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-4101-3038
James BatteRakai Health Sciences Program, Kalisizo, Uganda.
Hadijja NakawooyaRakai Health Sciences Program, Kalisizo, Uganda.
Boniface KigoziRakai Health Sciences Program, Kalisizo, Uganda.
Gertrude NakigoziRakai Health Sciences Program, Kalisizo, Uganda.
Susanne StrömdahlDepartment of Global Public Health and Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna Mia EkströmDepartment of Global Public Health and Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Larry W ChangRakai Health Sciences Program, Kalisizo, Uganda.
Ron GrayJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Steven J ReynoldsRakai Health Sciences Program, Kalisizo, Uganda.
Patrick KomaketchCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Kampala, Uganda.
Stella AlamoCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Kampala, Uganda.
David SerwaddaRakai Health Sciences Program, Kalisizo, Uganda.
Rakai Health Sciences Program · UGJohns Hopkins University · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USKarolinska University Hospital · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

Vaccine Response and Immunotherapeutics SWGP30AI094189 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Richard E. Chaisson · 2012 to 2026
$67.0M
CHWs, mHealth, and Combination HIV Prevention in a Hotspot: A Randomized TrialR01MH107275 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CHANG, LARRY WILLIAM · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
Hard-to-Reach Populations: Implications for Ending the AIDS EpidemicR01AI143333 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CHANG, LARRY WILLIAM · 2019 to 2022
$2.4M
Multidisciplinary Research Training to Understand and Reduce HIV Incidence in UgandaD43TW010557 · FIC · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CHANG, LARRY WILLIAM · 2018 to 2022
$1.6M
CDC HHS NU2GGH000817FIC NIH HHS D43 TW010557NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI094189NIAID NIH HHS P30AI094189NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI143333NIH HHS P30AI094189NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107275NIMH NIH HHS R01MH107275PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) programmes have been initiated in sub-Saharan Africa to prevent HIV acquisition in key populations at increased risk. However, data on PrEP uptake and retention in high-risk African communities are limited. We evaluated PrEP uptake and retention in HIV hyperendemic fishing villages and trading centres in south-central Uganda between April 2018 and March 2019.

methodsPrEP eligibility was assessed using a national risk screening tool. Programme data were used to evaluate uptake and retention over 12 months. Multivariable modified Poisson regression estimated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) and 95% Confidence intervals (CIs) of uptake associated with covariates. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to estimate retention and multivariable Cox regression to estimate adjusted relative hazards (aRH) and 95% CIs of discontinuation associated with covariates. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Of the 2985 HIV-negative individuals screened; 2750 (92.1 %) were eligible; of whom 2,536 (92.2%) accepted PrEP. Male (aPR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.85 to 0.97) and female (aPR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.77 to 0.94) fisher folk were less likely to accept compared to HIV-discordant couples. Median retention was 45.4 days for both men and women, whereas retention was higher among women (log rank, p < 0.001) overall. PrEP discontinuation was higher among female sex workers (aRH = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.83) and female fisher folk (aRH = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.46 to 2.72), compared to women in discordant couples. Male fisher folk (aRH = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.76) and male truck drivers (aRH = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.14 to 1.94) were more likely to discontinue compared to men in discordant couples. Women 30 to 34 years tended to have lower discontinuation rates compared to adolescents 15 to 19 years (RH = 0.78 [95% CI = 0.63 to 0.96]).

conclusionsPrEP uptake was high, but retention was very low especially among those at the highest risk of HIV: fisher folk, sex workers and truck drivers and adolescent girls. Research on reasons for PrEP discontinuation could help optimize retention.

Indexed as

Medication AdherencePre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdultAnti-HIV AgentsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleSex WorkersUgandaYoung AdultAnti-HIV AgentsHIV preventionLMICPrEPretentionrisk factorssex workers

Identifiers

PMID32785976
PMCPMC7421540
OpenAlexW3048790943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.