Trial reportGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2021
[Evaluation of the Model project "Prescription for Exercise" in Baden-Württemberg: An Explorative Qualitative Survey].
Trial report in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveExercise has a positive effect on health, which has already been proven in many studies. Doctors have an important role in helping patients to get more exercise. Against this background, the preventive model project "Exercise on Prescription" (RfB) was launched in Germany in 2009. This allows doctors to give their patients a prescription for exercise. In Baden-Württemberg, this offer was tested in 4 regions from 2015 to 2016. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the use of the RfB by doctors in Baden-Württemberg at the end of the trial phase by means of qualitative interviews of physicians participating in the program in 2017.
methodsThe telephone interviews were conducted using a structured interview guide.
resultsThe qualitative survey showed a positive attitude of the physicians towards the RfB. The lack of local offers and the lack of direct cost reimbursement by the statutory health in-surances were cited as inhibiting factors for the issuance of the RfB. Further influencing factors were the self-motivation of the patients and the anticipated probability of implementation.
conclusionThe present qualitative survey not only documented the obstacles to RfB being issued by doctors and the patients' implementation of the physical activity recommendations, but also beneficial factors with regard to the future use of the RfB outside the model project.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.