ArticleEndocrine2020
Status and clinical and radiological predictive factors of presurgical anterior pituitary function in pituitary adenomas. Study of 232 patients.
Article in Endocrine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical presentation and surgical outcomes of very large and giant pituitary adenomas: 80 cases in a cohort study of 306 patients with pituitary adenomas.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Article
- Article
- Development and internal validation of a predictive score for the diagnosis of central adrenal insufficiency when morning cortisol is in the grey zone.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2023Article
- Non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas: factors affecting postoperative recurrence, and pre- and post-surgical endocrine and visual function.Endocrine · 2021Article
- Radiological Knosp, Revised-Knosp, and Hardy-Wilson Classifications for the Prediction of Surgical Outcomes in the Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery of Pituitary Adenomas: Study of 228 Cases.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the status of preoperative anterior pituitary function in patients undergoing pituitary adenoma (PA) resection and to identify factors associated with preoperative anterior pituitary dysfunction (APD).
methodsPatients with functioning and nonfunctioning PAs who underwent pituitary adenoma resection for first time, from January 2009 to December 2019 were analyzed.
resultsTotal sample included 232 patients; 123 (53.2%) females, mean age at diagnosis was 53.3 years. Sixty-three percent presented as nonfunctioning PAs and 37.1% as functioning PAs. Eighty-eight percent were macroadenomas and 34.9% had cavernous sinus invasion. APD was demonstrated in 36.2% (n = 84) of the patients. The FSH/LH deficit was the most frequent anterior pituitary deficit (31.9%); followed by ACTH (18.1%); TSH (16.4%) and GH (13.8%). We identified as independent risk factors of APD, male sex (OR = 6.1, 95% CI = 3.3-11.0); age (OR = 1.03 for each year, 95% CI = 1.01-1.04), diabetes mellitus (OR = 3.5, 95% CI = 1.63-7.69), pituitary apoplexy presentation (OR = 4.3, 95% CI = 1.3-14.5) and tumor size (OR = 1.06 for each mm, 95% CI = 1.04-1.09). Nonfunctioning PAs (NFPA) had higher risk of APD than functioning PAs (FPA) (OR = 2.8 (95% CI = 1.5-5.0), but these differences disappeared after adjusted by tumor size (OR adjusted by tumor size = 1.7, 95% CI = 0.9-3.3). The tumor size with the highest diagnostic accuracy to predict hypopituitarism was 22 mm (sensitivity of 61.9% and specificity of 70.1%).
conclusionMore than one third of PAs candidates for surgery had APD. The male sex, diabetes, an older age, pituitary apoplexy, and larger PAs were risk factors of APD. Hence, in these patients, the hormonal study should be prioritized and the need for dynamic tests must be carefully assessed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.