Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32785891›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2020

Tenecteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Current Evidence and Practical Considerations.

Alejandro A Rabinstein, Esteban Golombievski, Jose Biller

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alejandro A RabinsteinDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Mayo W8B, Rochester, MN, USA. rabinstein.alejandro@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8359-2838
Esteban GolombievskiDepartment of Neurology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jose BillerDepartment of Neurology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Loyola University Chicago · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tenecteplase offers pharmacological advantages over alteplase, and growing evidence supports its consideration for the treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Its ease of administration as a single bolus makes it a preferable agent for patients who need to be urgently transported to a comprehensive stroke center for endovascular therapy (drip and ship) and for patients first evaluated at comprehensive stroke centers who are eligible for endovascular intervention (combined intravenous and endovascular approach). Recent randomized controlled trials indicated that the efficacy of tenecteplase may be similar to that of alteplase in patients with mild strokes and that it is superior to alteplase for patients with more severe strokes from a large vessel occlusion. Cumulative evidence currently favors the use of the 0.25 mg/kg dose. While tenecteplase has not been approved by regulatory agencies in the USA or the EU for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke, ongoing trials and additional clinical experience from countries where it is already being used in practice will likely clarify the role of tenecteplase for the acute management of ischemic stroke in the near future.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain IschemiaFibrinolytic AgentsHumansIschemic StrokeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTenecteplaseTissue Plasminogen ActivatorFibrinolytic AgentsTenecteplaseTissue Plasminogen Activator

Identifiers

PMID32785891
OpenAlexW3048480127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.