Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32785886›Full record

ArticleThe patient2020

Perceived Benefits and Facilitators and Barriers to Providing Psychosocial Interventions for Informal Caregivers of People with Rare Diseases: A Scoping Review.

Danielle B Rice, Andrea Carboni-Jiménez, Mara Cañedo-Ayala, Kimberly A Turner, Matthew Chiovitti, Alexander W Levis, Brett D Thombs

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The patient, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Caregivers' Internet-Delivered Insomnia Intervention Engagement and Benefit: SHUTi-CARE Trial Primary Quantitative Analysis.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2024
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Experiences of Health Care and Psychosocial Needs in Parents of Children with Spinal Muscular Atrophy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Danielle B RiceLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, 4333 Cote St-Catherine Road, Montréal, QC, H3T 1E4, Canada.
Andrea Carboni-JiménezLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, 4333 Cote St-Catherine Road, Montréal, QC, H3T 1E4, Canada.
Mara Cañedo-AyalaLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, 4333 Cote St-Catherine Road, Montréal, QC, H3T 1E4, Canada.
Kimberly A TurnerLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, 4333 Cote St-Catherine Road, Montréal, QC, H3T 1E4, Canada.
Matthew ChiovittiLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, 4333 Cote St-Catherine Road, Montréal, QC, H3T 1E4, Canada.
Alexander W LevisEpidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Brett D ThombsLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, 4333 Cote St-Catherine Road, Montréal, QC, H3T 1E4, Canada. brett.thombs@mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5644-8432
Jewish General Hospital · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the benefits, and barriers and facilitators to providing psychosocial support to caregivers to a loved one with a rare disease.

objectiveThe aim of our scoping review was to map evidence on (1) perceived benefits and (2) barriers and facilitators of establishing and maintaining services.

methodsThe CINAHL and PubMed databases were searched in December 2018. Qualitative and quantitative studies in any language that described perceived or tested benefits of participating in psychosocial interventions for caregivers, or the barriers and facilitators of providing these interventions, were eligible.

resultsThirty-four studies were included. Interventions were behavioural or psychological, supportive, educational, or multicomponent. All included studies reported on the benefits of participating in psychosocial interventions; 14 (41%) studies also reported on facilitators and 19 (56%) reported on barriers. Benefits that were most commonly found included statistically significant improvements in emotional states (e.g. stress) and caregiver burden and narrative reports of intervention helpfulness. Statistically significant improvements in mental health outcomes (e.g. depression symptoms) were rarely detected. Four themes for facilitators were identified, including intervention characteristics, intervention delivery characteristics, provision of necessary resources, and support provided outside of the intervention. Four barrier themes were also identified: misalignment of intervention to caregiver needs, inability to make time for intervention, practical barriers, emotional barriers.

conclusionsPsychosocial interventions for caregivers to a loved one with a rare disease may be helpful in reducing stress, burden, and feelings of isolation among caregivers. Future research should design interventions for caregivers that take into account facilitators and barriers to establishing and maintaining such interventions.

Indexed as

Psychosocial InterventionRare DiseasesCaregiversFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID32785886
OpenAlexW3048849470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.