Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32785877›Full record

ReviewBioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy2020

Failed, Interrupted, or Inconclusive Trials on Immunomodulatory Treatment Strategies in Multiple Sclerosis: Update 2015-2020.

Leoni Rolfes, Marc Pawlitzki, Steffen Pfeuffer, Niklas Huntemann, Heinz Wiendl, Tobias Ruck, Sven G Meuth

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Applying an Ethical Lens to the Treatment of People With Multiple Sclerosis.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leoni RolfesDepartment of Neurology With Institute of Translational Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany. leoni.rolfes@ukmuenster.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4494-951X
Marc PawlitzkiDepartment of Neurology With Institute of Translational Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Steffen PfeufferDepartment of Neurology With Institute of Translational Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Niklas HuntemannDepartment of Neurology With Institute of Translational Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Heinz WiendlDepartment of Neurology With Institute of Translational Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Tobias RuckDepartment of Neurology With Institute of Translational Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Sven G MeuthDepartment of Neurology With Institute of Translational Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past decades, multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment has experienced vast changes resulting from major advances in disease-modifying therapies (DMT). Looking at the overall number of studies, investigations with therapeutic advantages and encouraging results are exceeded by studies of promising compounds that failed due to either negative or inconclusive results or have been interrupted for other reasons. Importantly, these failed clinical trials are informative experiments that can help us to understand the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying MS. In several trials, concepts taken from experimental models were not translatable to humans, although they did not lack a well-considered pathophysiological rationale. The lessons learned from these discrepancies may benefit future studies and reduce the risks for patients. This review summarizes trials on MS since 2015 that have either failed or have been interrupted for various reasons. We identify potential causes of failure or inconclusiveness, looking at the path from basic animal experiments to clinical trials, and discuss the implications for our current view on MS pathogenesis, clinical practice, and future study designs. We focus on anti-inflammatory treatment strategies, without including studies on already approved and effective DMT. Clinical trials addressing neuroprotective and alternative treatment strategies are presented in a separate article.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisAnimalsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsHumansImmunomodulationAnti-Inflammatory Agents

Identifiers

PMID32785877
PMCPMC7519896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.