SynthesisArchives of dermatological research2021
The effects of tacrolimus plus phototherapy in the treatment of vitiligo: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Archives of dermatological research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this meta-analysis was performed to compare the effects of tacrolimus plus phototherapy in the treatment of patients with vitiligo. Relevant studies were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. The main outcomes of interest included excellent response (≥ 75% repigmentation), good response (50-75% repigmentation), moderate response (25%-50% repigmentation), and poor response (< 25% repigmentation). Risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) was used to calculate the data. Eleven studies were included in this study. Compared with phototherapy alone, combination treatment of tacrolimus and phototherapy significantly improved excellent response rate (RR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.16, 1.69; P < 0.001) and reduced the poor response rate (RR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.22, 0.61; P = 0.001). However, the good response rate (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.59, 1.69, P = 1.000) and moderate response rate (RR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.60, 1.38; P = 0.653) were not significantly different between the two treatments. Subgroup analysis suggested that combination treatment had a higher excellent response rate than phototherapy alone for lesions located in the face and proximal limbs. Both NB-UVB and EL, when added to tacrolimus, resulted in a significantly higher excellent response rate than they were used alone. Meta-regression analysis showed that age was a predictive factor that influenced the effect of combination treatment on an excellent response, in which children had a high excellent response to the treatment. Other demographic and clinical variables, including gender, disease duration, family history, and type of vitiligo, did not have any impact on the treatment effect. Combination treatment with tacrolimus and phototherapy was more effective than phototherapy monotherapy for patients with vitiligo, especially in the lesions located in the face and proximal limbs. More large-scale, well-performed trials are needed to verify our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.