ArticleDysphagia2021
Oropharyngeal Swallowing Dynamic Findings in People with Asthma.
Article in Dysphagia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dysphagia in non-intubated patients affected by COVID-19 infection.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022Article
- A Missing Voice: The Lingual Complex and Osteopathic Manual Medicine in the Context of Five Osteopathic Models.Cureus · 2021Review
- Influence of handgrip strength on pharyngeal transit time in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Airflow obstruction in people with asthma, similar to COPD, may interfere with swallowing, increasing the risk of food or liquid entrance into the lower airways, and favoring the uncontrolled disease. To describe the complaints and findings of the oropharyngeal swallowing mechanisms in patients with mild and severe asthma, a cross-sectional study was performed. A total of 135 participants with asthma were studied, of whom 97 had severe asthma and 38 had mild asthma. All subjects answered a questionnaire with demographic information, disease exacerbations, Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 (ACQ6-Juniper 1999), GastroEsophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms Questionnaire (GERD-SQ-Fornari et al. 2004), and Eating Assessment Tool 10 (EAT-10-Gonçalves et al., 2013). The oral and pharyngeal swallowing assessment occurred via videofluoroscopic swallowing evaluation. The age range of the participants was from 19 to 80 years, with a predominance of females (78.6%). Uncontrolled asthma was observed in 50 (52%) of the patients with severe asthma and in 11 (29%) of the patients with mild asthma (ACQ6 > 1.5). The GERD-SQ and EAT-10 scores were similar in both groups. In the bivariate analysis, the group with severe asthma presented with more changes when compared to the group with mild asthma in the following events: atypical lingual movement during the swallowing of liquid in the volumes of 5 ml (p = 0.003) and 10 ml (p = 0.001), and solid (p = 0.009); oral transit time increased in swallowing of liquid in the volumes of 5 ml (p = 0.003) and 20 ml (p = 0.026); beginning of the pharyngeal swallowing phase below the mandibular ramus (p = 0.003); pharyngeal residue (p = 0.017) of solid consistency; laryngeal penetration of 5 ml (p = 0.050) and 20 ml (p = 0.032) of liquid; increased transition time between the oral and pharyngeal swallowing phases (p = 0.035) and increased pharyngeal transit time (p = 0.045) of solid consistency. Tracheal aspiration was observed only in the group with severe asthma. After the multivariate analysis, atypical tongue movement maintained a statistically significant difference between the two groups. Oropharyngeal swallowing alternations were frequent in the studied sample and more markedly present in patients with severe asthma. Multivariate regression revealed atypical lingual movement, which was greater in patients with severe asthma. The clinical significance of these findings should be further investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.