ArticleEuropean radiology2021
Complex confounder-corrected R2* mapping for liver iron quantification with MRI.
Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reproducibility of liver iron concentration measured by R2* method based on 1.5-T MRI: a meta-analysis.European radiology · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical practice guidelines on hemochromatosis: Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver.Hepatology international · 2023Guideline
- Comparison of bi- and tri-component approaches for the analysis of short-TMagma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Exploring the mediating role of bone marrow fat in the liver iron-bone density relationship: A quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study.Osteoporosis and sarcopenia · 2026Article
- Clinical assessment of hepatic steatosis and iron content using three-dimensional (3D) multi-echo chemical shift encoded magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): correlation with histopathology.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Comparison of hepatic iron quantification by MRI between 1.5 and 3 T, using different methods and conversion formulas.European radiology · 2026Article
- Free-Breathing Hybrid Technique for Simultaneous Morphological and Quantitative Abdominal Imaging at 0.55 T.Investigative radiology · 2026Article
- A dedicated phantom for exploring the interplay of fat and paramagnetic substances in quantitative susceptibility mapping.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Multi-Center, Multi-Vendor Validation of Simultaneous MRI-Based Proton Density Fat Fraction and R2* Mapping Using a Combined Proton Density Fat Fraction-R2* Phantom.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
- State-of-the-Art Quantification of Liver Iron With MRI-Vendor Implementation and Available Tools.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Iron overload in paediatric oncology: the role of radiology in diagnosing and monitoring secondary haemochromatosis.Polish journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Liver Iron Overload: From Precise Quantification to Prognosis Assessment.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- IDEAL-IQ measurement can distinguish dysplastic nodule from early hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-control study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- [Metabolic study of iron deposition based on magnetic resonance in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2023Article
- Intra-examination agreement between multi-echo gradient echo and confounder-corrected chemical shift-encoded MR sequences for R2* estimation as a biomarker of liver iron content in patients with a wide range of T2*/R2* and proton density fat fraction values.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Article
- Confounder-corrected TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Quantification of Liver Iron Overload with MRI: Review and Guidelines from the ESGAR and SAR.Radiology · 2023Review
- Article
- Adding liver R2* quantification to proton density fat fraction MRI of vertebral bone marrow improves the prediction of osteoporosis.European radiology · 2022Article
- Addressing concomitant gradient phase errors in time-interleaved chemical shift-encoded MRI fat fraction and RMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesMRI-based R2* mapping may enable reliable and rapid quantification of liver iron concentration (LIC). However, the performance and reproducibility of R2* across acquisition protocols remain unknown. Therefore, the objective of this work was to evaluate the performance and reproducibility of complex confounder-corrected R2* across acquisition protocols, at both 1.5 T and 3.0 T.
methodsIn this prospective study, 40 patients with suspected iron overload and 10 healthy controls were recruited with IRB approval and informed written consent and imaged at both 1.5 T and 3.0 T. For each subject, acquisitions included four different R2* mapping protocols at each field strength, and an FDA-approved R2-based method performed at 1.5 T as a reference for LIC. R2* maps were reconstructed from the complex data acquisitions including correction for noise effects and fat signal. For each subject, field strength, and R2* acquisition, R2* measurements were performed in each of the nine liver Couinaud segments and the spleen. R2* measurements were compared across protocols and field strength (1.5 T and 3.0 T), and R2* was calibrated to LIC for each acquisition and field strength.
resultsR2* demonstrated high reproducibility across acquisition protocols (p > 0.05 for 96/108 pairwise comparisons across 2 field strengths and 9 liver segments, ICC > 0.91 for each field strength/segment combination) and high predictive ability (AUC > 0.95 for four clinically relevant LIC thresholds). Calibration of R2* to LIC was LIC = - 0.04 + 2.62 × 10
conclusionsComplex confounder-corrected R2* mapping enables LIC quantification with high reproducibility across acquisition protocols, at both 1.5 T and 3.0 T. KEY POINTS: • Confounder-corrected R2* of the liver provides reproducible R2* across acquisition protocols, including different spatial resolutions, echo times, and slice orientations, at both 1.5 T and 3.0 T. • For all acquisition protocols, high correlation with R2-based liver iron concentration (LIC) quantification was observed. • The calibration between confounder-corrected R2* and LIC, at both 1.5 T and 3.0 T, is determined in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.