ArticleEnvironmental management2020
An Analytical Review of Different Approaches to Wastewater Discharge Standards with Particular Emphasis on Nutrients.
Article in Environmental management, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 172 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global Harmonization of Life Cycle Assessments for Small- and Medium-Scale Wastewater Treatment.ACS ES&T water · 2026Article
- Insights into the potential of Chlorella species in the treatment of hazardous pollutants from industrial effluent.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Review
- The Future of Municipal Wastewater Reuse Concentrate Management: Drivers, Challenges, and Opportunities.Environmental science & technology · 2024Review
- Pollution Mitigation in Vermicelli Wastewater: Integrated Fenton and Aerobic Sludge Treatment for Water Quality Improvement.Scientifica · 2024Article
- Native microalgal-bacterial consortia from the Ecuadorian Amazon region: an alternative to domestic wastewater treatment.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- The Use of Neural Network Modeling Methods to Determine Regional Threshold Values of Hydrochemical Indicators in the Environmental Monitoring System of Waterbodies.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Tobacco Waste Liquid-Based Organic Fertilizer Particle for Controlled-Release Fulvic Acid and Immobilization of Heavy Metals in Soil.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Operation of Hybrid Membranes for the Removal of Pharmaceuticals and Pollutants from Water and Wastewater.Membranes · 2022Article
- Anaerobic Reactor Filling for Phosphorus Removal by Metal Dissolution Method.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Assessment of effluents quality through ecotoxicological assays: evaluation of three wastewater treatment plants with different technologies.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Trends, insights and effects of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (91/271/EEC) implementation in the light of the Polish coastal zone eutrophication.Environmental management · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the implementation of strict legal standards concerning nutrient loads within wastewater discharges in all European Union (EU) Member States it was not possible to achieve good ecological and chemical water status by 2015 in all EU countries. The main reasons for this situation are the imperfections of the legislation tools regarding the standardization of wastewater quality and the methodology of determining the conditions for wastewater introduction into receivers. The study aims to review and analyze the currently existing in various countries legal regulations setting the standards for wastewater discharged into receivers, which were intended for surface water protection and eutrophication mitigation. Besides the EU effluent standards, the regional and national regulations in chosen EU Member States (e.g., Germany, Sweden, and Denmark) have been reviewed. Moreover, the Helsinki Commission recommendations for signatory countries within the Baltic Sea catchment and the approaches for wastewater quality standardization in non-EU countries (e.g., Russia, Belarus, Switzerland, China, USA, Canada, and Dubai) were assessed. The analysis of the reviewed legal regulations allowed to diversify the methodological approaches for setting effluent quality standards in different regions and countries and to assess the effectiveness of existing legal tools in the field of eutrophication mitigation with the consideration of the environmental and economic reasonability. The results suggest that the receiver-oriented policies used among others in Switzerland and China are the most reasonable in terms of eutrophication mitigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.