ReviewDer Internist2020
[Erdheim-Chester disease-A histiocytic multisystem disease with unusual renal involvement].
Review in Der Internist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is nowadays classified as belonging to those neoplasms with origins in the myeloid dendritic cell lines. The clonal alterations maintain a chronic inflammatory condition, which dominates the pathogenesis and clinical expression. Characteristic for ECD are many skeletal manifestations; however, the multisystem disease affects many other organs (including the respiratory tract, heart, retroperitoneum, eyes, central nervous system and endocrine system). The diagnosis is usually first made only after a disease duration of many years. This is due to the rarity of the disease and the very diffuse symptoms in addition to the heterogeneous organ manifestations. There are no uniform diagnostic criteria. The constellation of unclear polyserositis and ostealgia, possibly in association with neurological and endocrine deficiencies, should steer the suspicion towards an ECD. The diagnosis can be confirmed by an organ biopsy and the immunohistochemical examination enables the relatively certain differentiation from other forms of histiocytosis. The detection of activating oncological mutations in signal transduction pathways has opened up the possibility of targeted treatment with kinase inhibitors, such as vemurafenib for BRAF V600E mutations. Up to the discovery of activating mutations, interferon-alpha was used as the first line treatment; however, in view of the superiority of kinase inhibitors, the first line treatment with interferon-alpha currently appears to be questionable. The prognosis for untreated ECD is exceptionally poor and interferon-alpha leads to a clear improvement. Further progress is hoped for with the use of targeted treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.