Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32785735›Full record

ReviewArchives of microbiology2021

Microbial biofilm ecology, in silico study of quorum sensing receptor-ligand interactions and biofilm mediated bioremediation.

Biji Balan, Amit S Dhaulaniya, Diksha A Varma, Kushneet K Sodhi, Mohit Kumar, Manisha Tiwari, Dileep Kumar Singh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Isolation and characterization of a newly chrysene-degrading Achromobacter aegrifaciens.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Biji BalanSoil Microbial Ecology and Environment Toxicology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India.
Amit S DhaulaniyaSoil Microbial Ecology and Environment Toxicology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India.
Diksha A VarmaBio-Organic Chemistry Laboratory, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Centre for Biomedical Research, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India.
Kushneet K SodhiSoil Microbial Ecology and Environment Toxicology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India.
Mohit KumarSoil Microbial Ecology and Environment Toxicology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India.
Manisha TiwariBio-Organic Chemistry Laboratory, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Centre for Biomedical Research, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India.
Dileep Kumar SinghSoil Microbial Ecology and Environment Toxicology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India. dileepksingh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5522-523X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilms are structured microbial communities of single or multiple populations in which microbial cells adhere to a surface and get embedded in extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). This review attempts to explain biofilm architecture, development phases, and forces that drive bacteria to promote biofilm mode of growth. Bacterial chemical communication, also known as Quorum sensing (QS), which involves the production, detection, and response to small molecules called autoinducers, is highlighted. The review also provides a brief outline of interspecies and intraspecies cell-cell communication. Additionally, we have performed docking studies using Discovery Studio 4.0, which has enabled our understanding of the prominent interactions between autoinducers and their receptors in different bacterial species while also scoring their interaction energies. Receptors, such as LuxN (Phosphoreceiver domain and RecA domain), LuxP, and LuxR, interacted with their ligands (AI-1, AI-2, and AHL) with a CDocker interaction energy of - 31.6083 kcal/mole; - 34.5821 kcal/mole, - 48.2226 kcal/mole and - 41.5885 kcal/mole, respectively. Since biofilms are ideal for the remediation of contaminants due to their high microbial biomass and their potential to immobilize pollutants, this article also provides an overview of biofilm-mediated bioremediation.

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalBiofilmsLigandsBacteriaBacterial ProteinsComputer SimulationQuorum SensingBacterial ProteinsLigandsAutoinducerBiofilmsBioremediationDockingQuorum sensing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.