Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32785706›Full record

ArticleAesthetic surgery journal2021

Comparison of Cellulite Severity Scales and Imaging Methods.

V Leroy Young, Barry E DiBernardo

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic surgery journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05441917 (Analysis Phototherapy and Radiofrecuency Added to a Physical Therapy Program for Treatment of Cellulite), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05441917 nasuspendednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Analysis Phototherapy and Radiofrecuency Added to a Physical Therapy Program for Treatment of Cellulite

TypeinterventionalSponsorQuiropraxia y EquilibrioRan2023 to 2025Enrolled48ConditionsCelluliteArmsSanae method with LED, Sanae method with Radiofrecuency
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Using High Frequency Ultrasound to Assess the Efficacy of Anti-Cellulite Treatments.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pathophysiology of cellulite: Possible involvement of selective endotoxemia.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Cellulite: Current Understanding and Treatment.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

V Leroy Young
Barry E DiBernardo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellulite is characterized by dimpled contour alterations of the skin and is present in approximately 85% to 90% of postpubertal females. Although the pathophysiology of cellulite remains to be fully elucidated, experimental evidence indicates a multifactorial process involving the number and types of fibrous septae, microvascular dysfunction, subcutaneous inflammation, decreased dermal thickness with age, and fat deposition. Cellulite is a major cosmetic concern for many women, and a number of both noninvasive (eg, massage, cosmeceuticals, laser therapy) and minimally invasive techniques (eg, subcision, collagenase injection) have been evaluated to improve the appearance of the affected skin. However, evidence for many of these treatments is limited, largely due to the lack of a validated, convenient tool for the standardized evaluation of cellulite severity. Various imaging modalities have been employed to characterize cellulite severity and the impact of treatment, but only 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional digital photography have been adequately validated. However, in many cases, imaging findings do not correlate with subjective measures of cellulite severity. A number of cellulite rating scales have been developed; some provide only a qualitative measure, whereas others do not fully capture all clinically relevant aspects of cellulite, including the perspective of the patient. There remains an unmet need for global adoption of a validated scale that can be utilized easily by clinicians and patients in clinical and research settings. We propose features that should be included in an ideal rating scale for assessment of cellulite severity.

Indexed as

CelluliteCosmetic TechniquesLaser TherapyAdipose TissueFemaleHumansSubcutaneous FatThighTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32785706
PMCPMC8129470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.