Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32785681›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2020

Supersized Ribosomal RNA Expansion Segments in Asgard Archaea.

Petar I Penev, Sara Fakhretaha-Aval, Vaishnavi J Patel, Jamie J Cannone, Robin R Gutell, Anton S Petrov, Loren Dean Williams, Jennifer B Glass

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Ribosome Biogenesis in Archaea.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Petar I PenevGeorgia Institute of Technology, NASA Center for the Origin of Life, Atlanta, Georgia.
Sara Fakhretaha-AvalGeorgia Institute of Technology, NASA Center for the Origin of Life, Atlanta, Georgia.
Vaishnavi J PatelDepartment of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Jamie J CannoneDepartment of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Robin R GutellDepartment of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Anton S PetrovGeorgia Institute of Technology, NASA Center for the Origin of Life, Atlanta, Georgia.
Loren Dean WilliamsGeorgia Institute of Technology, NASA Center for the Origin of Life, Atlanta, Georgia.
Jennifer B GlassGeorgia Institute of Technology, NASA Center for the Origin of Life, Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

Shared Services Center NASA 80NSSC18K1139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ribosome's common core, comprised of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and universal ribosomal proteins, connects all life back to a common ancestor and serves as a window to relationships among organisms. The rRNA of the common core is similar to rRNA of extant bacteria. In eukaryotes, the rRNA of the common core is decorated by expansion segments (ESs) that vastly increase its size. Supersized ESs have not been observed previously in Archaea, and the origin of eukaryotic ESs remains enigmatic. We discovered that the large ribosomal subunit (LSU) rRNA of two Asgard phyla, Lokiarchaeota and Heimdallarchaeota, considered to be the closest modern archaeal cell lineages to Eukarya, bridge the gap in size between prokaryotic and eukaryotic LSU rRNAs. The elongated LSU rRNAs in Lokiarchaeota and Heimdallarchaeota stem from two supersized ESs, called ES9 and ES39. We applied chemical footprinting experiments to study the structure of Lokiarchaeota ES39. Furthermore, we used covariation and sequence analysis to study the evolution of Asgard ES39s and ES9s. By defining the common eukaryotic ES39 signature fold, we found that Asgard ES39s have more and longer helices than eukaryotic ES39s. Although Asgard ES39s have sequences and structures distinct from eukaryotic ES39s, we found overall conservation of a three-way junction across the Asgard species that matches eukaryotic ES39 topology, a result consistent with the accretion model of ribosomal evolution.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularModels, MolecularRNA FoldingArchaeaRNA, RibosomalRNA, RibosomalarchaeaAsgardexpansion segmentsribosomal RNA

Identifiers

PMID32785681
PMCPMC7594248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.