Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32785673›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2020

Alignment-Integrated Reconstruction of Ancestral Sequences Improves Accuracy.

Kelsey Aadland, Bryan Kolaczkowski

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Advances and opportunities for computational interrogation of plant proteins.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Applications of ancestral sequence reconstruction for understanding the evolution of plant specialized metabolism.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Designing cytochrome P450 enzymes for use in cancer gene therapy.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction for Exploring Alkaloid Evolution.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  13. Resurrecting Enzymes by Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Setting the stage for evolution of a new enzyme.Current opinion in structural biology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kelsey AadlandDepartment of Microbiology and Cell Science, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida.
Bryan KolaczkowskiDepartment of Microbiology and Cell Science, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida.
University of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ancestral sequence reconstruction (ASR) uses an alignment of extant protein sequences, a phylogeny describing the history of the protein family and a model of the molecular-evolutionary process to infer the sequences of ancient proteins, allowing researchers to directly investigate the impact of sequence evolution on protein structure and function. Like all statistical inferences, ASR can be sensitive to violations of its underlying assumptions. Previous studies have shown that, whereas phylogenetic uncertainty has only a very weak impact on ASR accuracy, uncertainty in the protein sequence alignment can more strongly affect inferred ancestral sequences. Here, we show that errors in sequence alignment can produce errors in ASR across a range of realistic and simplified evolutionary scenarios. Importantly, sequence reconstruction errors can lead to errors in estimates of structural and functional properties of ancestral proteins, potentially undermining the reliability of analyses relying on ASR. We introduce an alignment-integrated ASR approach that combines information from many different sequence alignments. We show that integrating alignment uncertainty improves ASR accuracy and the accuracy of downstream structural and functional inferences, often performing as well as highly accurate structure-guided alignment. Given the growing evidence that sequence alignment errors can impact the reliability of ASR studies, we recommend that future studies incorporate approaches to mitigate the impact of alignment uncertainty. Probabilistic modeling of insertion and deletion events has the potential to radically improve ASR accuracy when the model reflects the true underlying evolutionary history, but further studies are required to thoroughly evaluate the reliability of these approaches under realistic conditions.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenetic TechniquesPhylogenySequence AlignmentStructure-Activity Relationshipalignment integrationalignment uncertaintyancestral sequence reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID32785673
PMCPMC7523730
OpenAlexW3064764435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.