Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32785666›Full record

Trial reportBlood2020

Venetoclax-rituximab with or without bendamustine vs bendamustine-rituximab in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.

Pier Luigi Zinzani, Ian W Flinn, Sam L S Yuen, Max S Topp, Chiara Rusconi, Isabelle Fleury, Katell Le Dû, Christopher Arthur, Barbara Pro, Giuseppe Gritti and 11 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02187861 (A Phase II, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of GDC-0199), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02187861 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of GDC-0199 (ABT-199) Plus Bendamustine Plus Rituximab (BR) in Comparison With BR Alone or GDC-0199 Plus Rituximab (R) in Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Follicular Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2014 to 2018Enrolled163ConditionsFollicular LymphomaArmsVenetoclax, Bendamustine, Rituximab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Towards a chemo-free approach for follicular lymphoma.British journal of haematology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. iScience · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Current and future therapies for follicular lymphoma.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 13 institutions in 8 countries.

Pier Luigi ZinzaniInstitute of Hematology "L. e A. Seràgnoli," University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Ian W FlinnSarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN.
Sam L S YuenDepartment of Haematology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW, Australia.
Max S ToppMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Chiara RusconiDivision of Hematology, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Isabelle FleuryDepartment of Hematology, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital and University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Katell Le DûHematology Department, Clinique Victor Hugo, Le Mans, France.
Christopher ArthurDepartment of Haematology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
Barbara ProRobert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL.
Giuseppe GrittiHematology and BMT Unit, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Michael CrumpPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Adam PetrichAbbVie, North Chicago, IL.
Divya SamineniGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA.
Arijit SinhaRoche Products Limited, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth A PunnooseGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA.
Edith Szafer-GlusmanGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA.
Nathalie SpielewoyF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland; and.
Mehrdad MobasherGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA.
Kathryn HumphreyRoche Products Limited, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom.
Martin KornackerF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland; and.
Wolfgang HiddemannDepartment of Medicine III, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Roche (Switzerland) · CHRoche (United Kingdom) · GBAbbVie (United States) · USAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITClinique Victor Hugo · FRLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · ITRobert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern UniversityRoyal North Shore Hospital · AUTennessee Oncology · USUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This open-label phase 2 study (CONTRALTO) assessed the safety and efficacy of BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) plus rituximab (R), and VEN plus bendamustine (B) and R, vs B + R (BR) alone in relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma. Patients in the chemotherapy-free arm (arm A: VEN + R) received VEN 800 mg/d plus R 375 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycle 1 and day 1 of cycles 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12. After a safety run-in with VEN 600 mg, patients in the chemotherapy-containing cohort were randomized to either VEN + BR (arm B; VEN 800 mg/d for 1 year + 6 cycles of BR [B 90 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 and R 375 mg/m2 on day 1]) or 6 cycles of BR (arm C). Overall, 163 patients were analyzed (9 in the safety run-in and 52, 51, and 51 in arms A, B, and C, respectively). Complete metabolic/complete response rates were 17% (arm A), 75% (arm B), and 69% (arm C). Of patients in arm B, only 61% received ≥90% of the planned B dose vs 96% of patients in arm C. More frequent hematologic toxicity resulted in more reduced dosing/treatment discontinuation in arm B vs arm C. Rates of grade 3/4 adverse events were 51.9%, 93.9%, and 60.0% in arms A, B, and C, respectively. VEN + BR led to increased toxicity and lower dose intensity of BR than in arm C, but efficacy was similar. Optimizing dose and schedule to maintain BR dose intensity may improve efficacy and tolerability of VEN + BR, while VEN + R data warrant further study. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02187861.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBendamustine HydrochlorideBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicFemaleHumansLymphoma, FollicularMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRituximabSulfonamidesBendamustine HydrochlorideBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicRituximabSulfonamidesvenetoclax

Identifiers

PMID32785666
PMCPMC7735159
OpenAlexW3068023701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.