ArticleJAMA cardiology2020
Cost-effectiveness of Sacubitril-Valsartan in Hospitalized Patients Who Have Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.
Article in JAMA cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cost-Effectiveness of Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors by Ejection Fraction and Drug Pricing in the United States: A Systematic Review.Circulation. Population health and outcomes · 2026Pooled it
- Budget impact analyses for treatment of heart failure. A systematic review.Heart failure reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Model parameters influencing the cost-effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure: evidence from a systematic literature review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023Pooled it
- Effect of sacubitril/valsartan on brain natriuretic peptide level and prognosis of acute cerebral infarction.PloS one · 2023Trial
- Cost Effectiveness of Vericiguat for the Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction Following a Worsening Heart Failure Event from a US Medicare Perspective.PharmacoEconomics · 2021Trial
- Towards a Multi-sectoral Approach to Population Health: A Scoping Review of Cross-sectoral Evaluations of Health Interventions.Applied health economics and health policy · 2026Review
- Real-World Cost-Effectiveness of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction in Korea.Korean circulation journal · 2025Article
- Hyperkalemia in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction Patients Treated with Sacubitril/Valsartan: Experience from a Tertiary Cardiac Center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
- Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor Prescribing Patterns in Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure.JAMA cardiology · 2025Article
- Health Care Spending After Initiating Sacubitril-Valsartan vs Renin-Angiotensin System Blockers for Heart Failure Treatment.JAMA health forum · 2025Article
- Reply: Withdrawal of Cardioprotective Therapy Following Improvement in Cancer Therapeutics-Related Cardiac Dysfunction.JACC. CardioOncology · 2025Article
- Industry marketing payments to physicians and prescription patterns for sacubitril/valsartan in the USA.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2025Article
- Improving the Management of Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction in Clinical Practice: The Case for Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor.Cardiac failure review · 2025Review
- Efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan combined with dapagliflozin in treating patients with heart failure and diabetes after an acute myocardial infarction.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Cost Effectiveness of Dapagliflozin for Heart Failure Across the Spectrum of Ejection Fraction: An Economic Evaluation Based on Pooled, Individual Participant Data From the DELIVER and DAPA-HF Trials.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Cost-utility analysis of valsartan, enalapril, and candesartan in patients with heart failure in Iran.Health economics review · 2023Article
- Review
- Sacubitril/Valsartan Ameliorates Crizotinib-Induced Cardiotoxicity in Mice.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Financial Toxicity of Medical Management of Heart Failure: JACC Review Topic of the Week.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2023Review
- Sacubitril/Valsartan for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis from the Perspective of the Chinese Healthcare System.Clinical drug investigation · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Sacubitril-valsartan use reduces mortality and hospitalizations compared with enalapril among patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); however, the cost-effectiveness of these treatments when initiated during hospitalization for HF is unknown. Objective: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of inpatient initiation of sacubitril-valsartan vs enalapril compared with no initiation or posthospitalization initiation of sacubitril-valsartan among stabilized patients with HFrEF. Design, Setting, and Participants: This economic evaluation included data on US patients with HFrEF who were eligible for sacubitril-valsartan treatment from December 8, 2009, to May 15, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: A 5-state Markov model with all-cause mortality, HF, and non-HF hospitalization probabilities was used. Quality of life was estimated using Euro-QoL EQ-5D scores. Hospitalization, long-term care, and medication costs for sacubitril-valsartan and enalapril were modeled with a discount rate of 3%. The base-case analysis included a lifetime horizon from a health care and societal perspective. Results: Modeled patients were a mean (SD) age of 63.8 (11.5) years. Inpatient treatment with sacubitril-valsartan ($5628 per year) was associated with 62 fewer HF-related admissions per 1000 patients compared with outpatient initiation or 116 fewer HF-related admissions compared with continuation of enalapril treatment. From a health care system perspective, initiation of sacubitril-valsartan during hospitalization saved $452 per year compared with continuing enalapril and $811 per year compared with initiation at 2 months after hospitalization and was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $21 532 per quality-adjusted life-year compared with continued enalapril treatment over a lifetime. From a societal perspective, inpatient initiation was estimated to save $460 per year per patient compared with no initiation of sacubitril-valsartan and $813 per year per patient compared with initiation after hospitalization. In a budget analysis, inpatient initiation of sacubitril-valsartan was estimated to save up to $449 per person for 1 year or $2550 per person over 5 years compared with continuation of enalapril. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that, for patients with HFrEF, initiation of sacubitril-valsartan during hospitalization may be associated with reduced hospitalizations, increased quality-adjusted life expectancy, and cost savings compared with no initiation or initiation after hospitalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.