Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2021
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Adults With Hospital-acquired or Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia (RESTORE-IMI 2 Study).
Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02493764 (A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam), which is not on this map. Cited by 107 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam (MK-7655A) Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Subjects With Hospital-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia or Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia
Who cites it
107 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 215 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (IMI/CS/REL): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Population pharmacokinetics of imipenem in different populations for individualized dosing: a systematic review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Global trends in carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria research (2020-2025): a bibliometric analysis and systematic review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Pooled it
- Friends or foes? Novel antimicrobials tackling MDR/XDR Gram-negative bacteria: a systematic review.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of novel carbapenem-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations: Results from phase II and III trials.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Pooled it
- Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam dosing regimen justification using exposure-efficacy analyses in participants with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia in the RESTORE-IMI 2 phase 3 study.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026Trial
- Real-World Applications of Imipenem-Cilastatin-Relebactam: Insights From a Multicenter Observational Cohort Study.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Trial
- A randomized non-inferiority study comparing imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam with standard-of-care Gram-negative coverage in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2024Trial
- Novel β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitors Versus Best Available Therapy on the Mortality-Related Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Altered regulation of septal peptidoglycan synthesis modulates β-lactam susceptibility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Evaluating the efficiency of platform trials relative to stand-alone trials: a simulation study for the evaluation of new antibacterials.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Gram-negative bacterial infection randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the 21st century: characteristics and evolution.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Review
- Systematic Review of Antimicrobial Therapies and Clinical Outcomes inLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Development of a novel LC-MS/MS method for concurrent determination of imipenem, relebactam, and cilastatin in human serum, urine and peritoneal drainage fluid.BMC chemistry · 2026Article
- Safety Profiles of Polymyxins, Aminoglycosides, and Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam (IMI/REL) in the Treatment of Gram-Negative Infections: A Literature Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Precision Approaches to Carbapenem-Resistant Infections in the ICU: Integrating Diagnostics, Stewardship, and Novel Therapies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Exploring the Effectiveness of Imipenem/Relebactam in Patients with Antimicrobial-Resistant Hospital-Acquired Infections: Findings from Systematic Literature Reviews.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cost-minimizing alternative dosage regimens of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam for patients with renal impairment: a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic simulation study.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Real-World Evidence and Multidrug Resistant Infections: How Can We Leverage RWE to Improve Patient Outcome with the Novel Beta-Lactam and Beta-Lactam/Beta-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Review
47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
18 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImipenem combined with the β-lactamase inhibitor relebactam has broad antibacterial activity, including against carbapenem-resistant gram-negative pathogens. We evaluated efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam in treating hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP).
methodsThis was a randomized, controlled, double-blind phase 3 trial. Adults with HABP/VABP were randomized 1:1 to imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam 500 mg/500 mg/250 mg or piperacillin/tazobactam 4 g/500 mg, intravenously every 6 hours for 7-14 days. The primary endpoint was day 28 all-cause mortality in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population (patients who received study therapy, excluding those with only gram-positive cocci at baseline). The key secondary endpoint was clinical response 7-14 days after completing therapy in the MITT population.
resultsOf 537 randomized patients (from 113 hospitals in 27 countries), the MITT population comprised 264 imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and 267 piperacillin/tazobactam patients; 48.6% had ventilated HABP/VABP, 47.5% APACHE II score ≥15, 24.7% moderate/severe renal impairment, 42.9% were ≥65 years old, and 66.1% were in the intensive care unit. The most common baseline pathogens were Klebsiella pneumoniae (25.6%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18.9%). Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was noninferior (P < .001) to piperacillin/tazobactam for both endpoints: day 28 all-cause mortality was 15.9% with imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and 21.3% with piperacillin/tazobactam (difference, -5.3% [95% confidence interval {CI}, -11.9% to 1.2%]), and favorable clinical response at early follow-up was 61.0% and 55.8%, respectively (difference, 5.0% [95% CI, -3.2% to 13.2%]). Serious adverse events (AEs) occurred in 26.7% of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and 32.0% of piperacillin/tazobactam patients; AEs leading to treatment discontinuation in 5.6% and 8.2%, respectively; and drug-related AEs (none fatal) in 11.7% and 9.7%, respectively.
conclusionsImipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is an appropriate treatment option for gram-negative HABP/VABP, including in critically ill, high-risk patients. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02493764.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.