Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32785583›Full record

Trial reportSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2021

Physiological linkage among successful high-status women in international teams.

Katherine R Thorson, Oana D Dumitru, Tessa V West

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katherine R ThorsonDepartment of Psychology, Barnard College of Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Oana D DumitruDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Tessa V WestDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contemporary society, decisions are often made by teams whose members represent different nationalities and genders. In the current work, participants from 55 countries formed groups of 3 to 4 people to select one of the 5 firms in a mock firm search. In all groups, one woman was randomly assigned to have higher status than her groupmates; she was also surreptitiously instructed to persuade her group to select one (randomly assigned) firm. We measured cardiac interbeat intervals for participants throughout the decision-making process to assess physiological linkage-the degree to which a 'sender's' physiological response predicts a 'receiver's' physiological response at a subsequent time interval. On average, high-status women were successful at persuasion. The physiological responses of successful high-status women were also predicted by the responses of their female groupmates: stronger linkage to female group members during the task was associated with success at persuading the group. Successful high-status women were also perceived as more persuasive than others in the group. This work shows that the link between status and successful persuasion generalizes to women among heterogeneous international teams. It also suggests that attention to others-often associated with physiological linkage-may be useful in persuading others during decision-making.

Indexed as

Persuasive CommunicationDecision MakingFemaleHeart RateHumansdecision-makinginterpersonal physiologypersuasionphysiological linkagesmall groups

Identifiers

PMID32785583
PMCPMC7812631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.