Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32785289›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Effects of preferred music on physiological responses, perceived exertion, and anaerobic threshold determination in an incremental running test on both sexes.

Felipe Marroni Rasteiro, Leonardo Henrique Dalcheco Messias, Pedro Paulo Menezes Scariot, João Pedro Cruz, Rafael Lucas Cetein, Claudio Alexandre Gobatto, Fúlvia Barros Manchado-Gobatto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Musical feedback system JymminFrontiers in sports and active living · 2022
    Article
  6. The Influence of Music Preference on Exercise Responses and Performance: A Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Felipe Marroni RasteiroLaboratory of Applied Sport Physiology - LAFAE, School of Applied Sciences, University of Campinas, UNICAMP, Limeira, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1991-9004
Leonardo Henrique Dalcheco MessiasLaboratory of Applied Sport Physiology - LAFAE, School of Applied Sciences, University of Campinas, UNICAMP, Limeira, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pedro Paulo Menezes ScariotLaboratory of Applied Sport Physiology - LAFAE, School of Applied Sciences, University of Campinas, UNICAMP, Limeira, São Paulo, Brazil.
João Pedro CruzLaboratory of Applied Sport Physiology - LAFAE, School of Applied Sciences, University of Campinas, UNICAMP, Limeira, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rafael Lucas CeteinLaboratory of Applied Sport Physiology - LAFAE, School of Applied Sciences, University of Campinas, UNICAMP, Limeira, São Paulo, Brazil.
Claudio Alexandre GobattoLaboratory of Applied Sport Physiology - LAFAE, School of Applied Sciences, University of Campinas, UNICAMP, Limeira, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fúlvia Barros Manchado-GobattoLaboratory of Applied Sport Physiology - LAFAE, School of Applied Sciences, University of Campinas, UNICAMP, Limeira, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate and compare the effects of preferred music on anaerobic threshold determination in an incremental running test, as well the physiological responses and perceived exertion at this intensity, in physically active men and women. Additionally, by using area under the curve (AUC) analysis of the parameters of interest during the graded test, we studied the effects of music at two physiological moments-before and after anaerobic threshold intensity (iAT)-in men and women. Twenty (men = 10; women = 10) healthy and active participants completed four visits to the laboratory. The first and second sessions were used for sample characterization. In the third and fourth sessions, participants performed an incremental running test (started at 7 km.h-1 with increments of 1 km.h-1 at each 3-minute stage) under preferred music and non-music conditions. Blood lactate ([Lac]), heart rate (HR), and perceived exertion were measured by two scales (RPEBorg and the estimation of time limit ‒ ETL) during all tests, and the total time of effort (TT) was considered as performance. Individual curves of the "intensity vs blood lactate" analyzed by the bissegmentation method provide the iAT and the AUC of [Lac], HR, RPEBorg, and ETL before and after the iAT attainment were calculated. The iAT for men (non-music: 11.5±0.9km.h-1 vs music: 11.6±1.1km.h-1) and women (non-music: 9.8±0.7km.h-1 vs music: 9.7±0.7km.h-1) was not affected by music, and for both sexes, there was no difference between non-music and music conditions in all variables obtained at iAT. The AUC of all variables were not affected by music before the iAT attainment. However, [Lac], HR, and RPEBorg presented higher values of AUC after iAT for the female group with preferred music. This may be due to the fact that 70% of women have increased TT under music conditions. Overall, preferred music did not affect the iAT determination in an incremental running test. However, some physiological responses and perceived exertion after iAT of female subjects seems to be influenced by preferred music.

Indexed as

Anaerobic ThresholdMusicRunningAdultFemaleHeart RateHumansLactic AcidMalePhysical EndurancePhysical ExertionYoung AdultLactic Acid

Identifiers

PMID32785289
PMCPMC7423319
OpenAlexW3048417925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.