Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32785271›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

The prevalence and genomic context of Shiga toxin 2a genes in E. coli found in cattle.

Tomas Jinnerot, Angeles Tatiana Ponton Tomaselli, Gro Skøien Johannessen, Robert Söderlund, Anne Margrete Urdahl, Anna Aspán, Camilla Sekse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparative genomics of Shiga toxin-producingFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Virulence Genes of PathogenicAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Genomic Epidemiology of Shiga Toxin-ProducingAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tomas JinnerotNational Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden.
Angeles Tatiana Ponton TomaselliNorwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway.
Gro Skøien JohannessenNorwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway.
Robert SöderlundNational Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anne Margrete UrdahlNorwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway.
Anna AspánNational Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden.
Camilla SekseNorwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2524-9713
Norwegian Veterinary Institute · NOSwedish Veterinary Agency · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) that cause severe disease predominantly carry the toxin gene variant stx2a. However, the role of Shiga toxin in the ruminant reservoirs of this zoonotic pathogen is poorly understood and strains that cause severe disease in humans (HUSEC) likely constitute a small and atypical subset of the overall STEC flora. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of stx2a in samples from cattle and to isolate and characterize stx2a-positive E. coli. In nationwide surveys in Sweden and Norway samples were collected from individual cattle or from cattle herds, respectively. Samples were tested for Shiga toxin genes by real-time PCR and amplicon sequencing and stx2a-positive isolates were whole genome sequenced. Among faecal samples from Sweden, stx1 was detected in 37%, stx2 in 53% and stx2a in 5% and in skin (ear) samples in 64%, 79% and 2% respectively. In Norway, 79% of the herds were positive for stx1, 93% for stx2 and 17% for stx2a. Based on amplicon sequencing the most common stx2 types in samples from Swedish cattle were stx2a and stx2d. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) of 39 stx2a-positive isolates collected from both countries revealed substantial diversity with 19 different sequence types. Only a few classical LEE-positive strains similar to HUSEC were found among the stx2a-positive isolates, notably a single O121:H19 and an O26:H11. Lineages known to include LEE-negative HUSEC were also recovered including, such as O113:H21 (sequence type ST-223), O130:H11 (ST-297), and O101:H33 (ST-330). We conclude that E. coli encoding stx2a in cattle are ranging from strains similar to HUSEC to unknown STEC variants. Comparison of isolates from human HUS cases to related STEC from the ruminant reservoirs can help identify combinations of virulence attributes necessary to cause HUS, as well as provide a better understanding of the routes of infection for rare and emerging pathogenic STEC.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleDisease ReservoirsEscherichia coli InfectionsGenetic VariationGenome, BacterialHemolytic-Uremic SyndromeHumansMultilocus Sequence TypingNorwayPrevalenceReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionShiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coliShiga Toxin 2SwedenVirulenceShiga Toxin 2

Identifiers

PMID32785271
PMCPMC7423110
OpenAlexW3048648085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.